I mean... I give a fuck, the intention behind the action is just as important as the action itself.
You argue we should be grateful because a company is participating in rainbow capitalism, and that makes people feel accepted and happy. Fair enough. But if Home Depot spends the other 11 months of the year donating to organizations and political groups that are actively trying to take away the rights of LGBT+ folks...
How is that a win for anyone? Like, are we supposed to jump up and down with joy because a company decided our money was worth accepting for a brief period of time? We're allowed to exist for one month because it results in a profit increase for a company that actively hates who we are the rest of the year?
In what world does that make sense? "We hate you and want you back in the closet, but we threw a rainbow on this shovel, BUY IT OR YOU HATE LGBT PEOPLE. Cool, now go back in the closet, we've got what we wanted out of you."
It's patronizing at best, and insulting at worst. You liken it to a vaccine, which is a bad example since, famously, vaccines like Polio were released without a patent to help ensure their widespread use across the globe.
To me, it's more like "Why are you complaining that this restaurant spits in your sandwich every day? They didn't spit in it today because it's Pride, so why aren't you happy about it?" Because I know in 30 days they're going to spit in my sandwich again, and they're only not doing it now because of optics and wanting more money.
Purchased a soft drink from a fast food restaurant. I have a few friends that, in their minds, it is never justified to buy a drink from a fast food place if you're doing takeout because "you have drinks at home, they charge $3 for something that costs them $0.11 to make, etc."
It's become somewhat of a debate amongst our group of friends: I argue they have flavors I may not have at home, it can be a treat, and it helps keep restaurants in business since drinks are where they make their money. I'm told it doesn't matter, the upcharge is too much to justify.
I've boiled my view on it to "There is a fine line between frugal and cheap." But never thought the purchase of a soft drink would be so polarizing amongst people in my life, hahaha.
There's also an ongoing moratorium on the board game Life simply because we cannot agree if it's legal for one player to take out all of the bank's loans on their first turn. It's not explicitly stated in the rules you can't, but many of us feel it defeats the spirit of the game.
The older guy at the beginning gives him and the people around him a look of "Wtf is this guy doing?!" with the upward-facing palm gesture when the guy first starts. He's also one of the ones leaving towards the end.
But seriously... Fuck the guy with the gun, broke damn near every firearm safety rule for what, the sake of a dance?
Fun fact: The Navy uses the affirmative "aye" or "aye aye" as opposed to "roger" like the Army/Air Force/etc because of similar slang origins. Basically, sailors used to use the word "roger" to mean "fuck," both as an insult and as a way to identify women they had been with while in port.
"Yeah, I rogered her last night at the tavern," kind of thing. But as sailors began to respond to officers using "Roger that (fuck that)," the Navy came down and made "aye aye" the official affirmative response for their personnel.
And even then, "aye" is simply a "I understand" whereas "aye aye," means "I understand and will carry out X."
The US Navy also launched an investigative unit during the 1800s (I wanna say the 1880s?) to find homosexual sailors and kick them out of the Navy. The unit only lasted a couple of years before being shut down, as the only people volunteering for the unit were homosexual sailors. 😆
My mom has no sense of smell, I believe it was from a polyp surgery where the surgeon nicked something during the operation. We couldn't have any gas powered appliances growing up because she wouldn't be able to smell a leak if there was one.
Plenty of reasons beyond COVID for why someone may not be able to smell.
From high middle-high school timeframe, probably The Yellow Wallpaper, I just think about that one at least a few times a year. And I only read it the one time in school.
The less well known one I remember from elementary school was My Brother Sam is Dead. It's about a family during the American revolution, where the father just wants to stay out of all of it and live their lives, but the eldest son wants to join the revolution. The whole story is just the hardships the family has to go through after the son runs off with the only gun to fight and ends up dying, and how that affects the family and the youngest brother, who the story is told from the perspective of.
None of my friends remember My Brother Sam is Dead, but if I'm remembering right, the ending is kinda dark for a bunch of 3-5th graders.
Ehhh, people don't take kindly to assertions regarding animals/pets. It's not the same, but look how quickly everyone, including Republicans, turned on Kristi Noem after she doubled down on shooting her own dog.
Yeah, he'll rile up some of his base in Ohio and they'll start taking precautions to protect their animals, but the majority of pet owners aren't going to buy this, and they'll hopefully condemn him for not only the outright lies, but the xenophobia/racism embroiled with it.
What's fucking infuriating is that you never answered my questions down below, holocaust denier.
I use my own bag a lot of the time because my usual grocery store (ShopRite) doesn't put out baskets anymore. I don't want a cart or need a cart, I want a basket, but they're never out anymore. Like, they're just gone...
So either put the baskets back out, or accept we're going to use our reusable bags as baskets. Granted, I flip mine upside down in front of the self checkout camera to show I'm not stealing, but ffs... Just put the baskets back. 😭
Ok, so then what was the plan? If the killing was a mercy, and was expedited by Germany losing the war, what was the plan for the 17 million collective people? Because I provided such a dismally low number of under one million in response to your comment saying the only reason the Nazis started killing more quickly was because they were losing. And those one million (more, since I'm sure my source didn't count all deaths, only those who were Jewish) mattered to people, so they mean no less than the other 16 million killed later during the war.
I'm waiting, I've provided sources regardless of whether you respect them, you've provided nothing to back up any of your claims, so why don't you refute my apparently unfounded claims of you being a holocaust denier?
Is that civil enough for a discussion with a holocaust denier, moderators? I'm glad we have to respect the opinions of holocaust deniers, god bless tolerating the intolerant. 🙄
@BlitzoTheOisSilent
@lemmy.world