ā¢
No joke, there's a whole world of memes and interpretations we can get from them
What is it showing? What did it learn from in order to do that?
Like r/DisneyVacation, but with whatever the AI was smoking in slide 4
ā¢
I've been putting a lot of thought into automating an AI bot that would do something randomy to generate seed prompts and then feed that through an image generator and post it.
ā¢
It then gave me step-by-step text instructions on how to use the OCR feature in Microsoft Word to import text from a picture, and admitted in step 3 that the function doesn't exist. There were 6 steps.
ā¢
All I could think about when reading the numbers was the It Crowd emergency phone number song: https://youtu.be/GTRil00Lfhc
ā¢
Here is an alternative Piped link(s):
https://piped.video/GTRil00Lfhc
Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.
I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.
Some of the current thought on shortcomings of LLM capabilities actually takes influence from human cognitive science, and what can be learned from those with neurological impairments. It's thought that human language abilities are strongly dissociated from other reasoning abilities because individuals with aphasia can lack the ability to speak or comprehend language, yet be able to solve mathematical problems, engage in logical reasoning, enjoy music, categorize objects and events, etc.
It's shown that LLMs develop a crude world model for performing reasoning tasks, yet it's inextricably tied up with their language functionalities (since they are ONLY language based). The hope for future research is to develop AIs with world models and planning faculties that are decoupled from the language analysis module, which would mitigate hallucination and aid in interpretability.
ā¢
I was following it correctly up until the part where you have to place a child on your laptop. I wish these things would let you know the parts required beforehand.
ā¢
I regularly feel like I've turned into a magician when 30 layers deep into my process of "fixing" something. So at least that is accurate.
ā¢
What is fun to me is that it completely made up a bunch of computer and office accessories that don't exist.
ā¢
I worked in a print shop in the 90s (until 95) and we still used xacto knives for our layouts. We had a computer but on now really knew how to use it for graphic design yet.
ā¢
The text in the image represents how accurate it tends to be whenever I try to OCR a document.
ā¢
This is why I'm convinced no LLM could ever accurately produce the insane and moronic shit he comes up with.
ā¢
I'm actually impressed by the reasonably coherent (though nonsense) text. If you think about how generative AI works it's very surprising it could form words in images.
ā¢
Microsoft's image generator has been getting better and better at text. There are still plenty of problems, especially with small text, but someone on another forum was able to get it to output this with a very small prompt:
ā¢
Last step, "diable" is the devil in French. Therefore the last text more or less means "OCR the text into the devil's text"
ā¢
I prefer to convord ttp manually rather than use the trext tims.
But then how do you ensure that the text will be diƄble?
ā¢
I disagree. This is as you say Precisely the type of thing that happens when an image generator is asked to make a chart/diagram, so to me it seems a really wild leap to go from "This looks like exactly what happens when X" to "someone must have designed this to look like what happens when X".
If it were human designed, I think it would be intentionally funny (which realistically would backfire, but anyway...)
(And besides, paid ChatGPT does indeed connect to DALL-E 3 now)
ā¢
Tbf I thought DALL-E3 was still just available via bing image creator, missed the memo that ChatGPT was hooked up to it too.
Still, for me though it still looks like it's human generated to try and be funny (it's just haha-AI-so-silly isn't groundbreakingly funny any more). It's mostly the information continuity throughout the image that I've not really seen from an image generating AI before (especially when not even prompted for it), and I've had a play around with DALL-E3 so I would expect the ChatGPT version to be equivalent.
Maybe I'm too cynical, but this just reeks of fake to me.
ā¢
I tried the same prompts as OP, it didn't generate an image at first instance - had to ask it to generate one. This is the image I got:
ā¢
ChatGPT takes the liberty of creating a DALL-E prompt that it doesn't feel the need to share with the user. You can, however, ask ChatGPT to share the exact prompt and seed with you to reproduce the image. Here is the actual prompt and seed DALL-E ended up working with:
Prompt: "A step-by-step visual guide on using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) in Microsoft Word. The guide includes steps like opening Microsoft Word, inserting an image into a Word document, selecting the image, and using the OCR feature to convert the text in the image into editable text. The layout should be clear and easy to follow, with each step labeled and illustrated in a user-friendly manner, catering to users with basic proficiency in Microsoft Word."
Seed: 3993182816
To be clear, ChatGPT decided on its own to create and send this prompt to DALL-E in response to my request for tech support.
ā¢
There's a level of continuity in the image you don't get with image generating AI yet.
Also it's littered with "AI getting things slightly wrong* memes
Also also, ChatGPT doesn't output images
Yep, sure, it's a wild world we live in and this topic is changing fast. Missing this memo won't matter when the next one will be the next generation but generations are only 6 months apart.
ā¢
I had a lot of fun asking it to draw ASCII art for me... especially if you ask it for corrections about specific aspects of its art