True, but I do unironically know libertarians like this. Minus the Texas patch. They're not so much into cheerleading for governments.
I mean, it's not a group famous for their high rate of desktop computer use, but the ones that do actually make that a significant part of their life tend to be pretty likely to use Linux in my experience.
All the security updates are in the microcode loaded by the bootloader even before the kernel is loaded, so unless there's some new feature, bugfix, or hardware support you specifically know you need it's not important to update your BIOS anyway. Which is good, because as far as I can tell you're just screwed by a bad hardware vendor.
Pfft. The idea that Kamala Harris wouldn't have voted the same way as Biden on Iraq and Afganistan if she had been in Congress back in 2001 is so naive that I can't even take anything else you said seriously. That is hilarious.
Congratulations, you aren't skeptical of Kamala Harris, and therefore aren't the person I was talking about. Good for you, but you didn't prove anything wrong.
I have been called many things throughout my life. Some of them were even good. Classy has never once been one of them.
I mean, people are complicated and different from each other. I'm sure there are lots of independents and leftists that's all true of, and I'm sure if you looked around you could even find a few members of the Democratic Party that fit that and also are skeptical of Kamala Harris.
I think most people who are within the mainstream of the Democratic Party and also worried about Kamala Harris as the presidential candidate are likely mostly people who have let demographic polling rot their brains though. That is what I was attempting to say with my original post.
Well, what else do you want me to say? Do you want me to just type out the same response over and over? What do you even want out of me?
@zephr_c
@lemm.ee