@tinkling4938
@lemmynsfw.comWhat is the point of being dismissive of parent's concerns and straight up misrepresenting what they said in the last "quote"?
I'm in favor of making the law gender neutral, and quickly without having answers to all these questions.
Doesn't mean there won't be unintended consequences that aren't worth discussing to get ahead of them.
My gut reaction is if its legal in public does that make it legal in the media? Will publishers and advertisers use this to further objectify women? Even though I'm asking these questions, I'm 100% in favor of gender neutral laws for media and advertisements.
My off the cuff and likely unrealistic solution that has nothing to do with gender is to just ban most forms of advertising out right. This includes never requiring users to make the "choice" to agree to any ads in the terms of services in order to access goods and services (e.g., gas pumps, accessing a bank account, etc.).
|--8.1%--|--------91.9%----------|
^
|______ Mr. Smartpants is here
Wording confused me at first glance also. Pretty much flexing he is not as smart as 91.9% of the population.
Correction, cost of goods is what I meant. I'm not going to Walmart just for the WiFi.
My comment was also meant to be sarcastic. Free WiFi while I spend my earnings, which I'd expect prices to reflect the cost of this service, in a giant metal box seems fair to me. Trading privacy as an extra cost I'm not okay with, so I won't use it.
Also, you pay for your cellphone service, right? Are you paying for the wifi in the store? Nooooooo.
Yes? Indirectly its baked into the cost of service.
I have no empathy for most politicians or the harm they have done out of greed.
I'm not in favor of a single individual being judge, jury, and executioner.
Our system for dealing with corruption is insufficient and infected by the corrupt.
Other than some Ghandi-level mass nonviolent resistance, one is likely to just end up on the streets (as designed by the corrupt in question), or the way things are going, soon a wall.
It sucks...
Maybe the kiss-ass management. I either see the idiots touting the company line like its gospel or the ones who just want to get shit done as pissed off as everybody else. I'm sure there are those who abuse WFH, but they are driving all their talent away with these policies.
The useless buildings are probably more to blame. Need them tax breaks to min/max their property investments by pushing the cost of transportation onto the labor class.
And why the fuck are they allowed to be funding our representatives. "Do what we want with the wealth we didn't earn or the bribes stop."