This is fair and I am willing to look at other distributions. I looked at some of the commands for alpine linux and baulked, worst comes to worst I can alias things though.
I'll take a look at it thanks.
Gonna trial ArchBang which looks like it's supposed to run at around 500MB worth of RAM.
"One side" both sides outright lied. So have to disagree on at least that point.
As I keep being told the UK is a 'representative democracy', it is generally your MP who decides the specifics, as the voting electorate it's your job to decide which strategy should be followed. This is why manifestos are presented and that they are not complete covering every policy. The EU also made it abundantly clear (as they threw their toys out of the pram) that the UK could not 'cherry pick' parts of the EU, they were either in or out. There was no option of remaining part of the single market so it would be silly to offer that to the public.
Yes or No, was a legally non-binding way to advise government. What the government did with that information was their own effort. The referendum was sound. That someone lied should not preclude us from voting on things, because all politicians lie... except perhaps in wales where it might actually be a criminal offense for politicians to lie soon(tm)...
There actually was a deal with the EU, several of them, however, the public then elected Boris Johnson deciding by electoral mandate that they wanted out and leave meant leave, not half in half out, just fuck 'em. It's rather sweet to pretend that there wasn't a general election before we actually left. There was a chance for the public to opt towards trying to remain in the single market, whether via Theresa May's deal or by electing Labour.
The reason I mention prison, is because when someone is convicted of racism, that's generally what happens. Depending on your country blackface can land you in prison.
Legal issues are Human Decency issues boiled down. I think you do have to have intent or some awareness to be racist. Whether you recognize that as racism or not is a different matter. Is it human decency to want to emulate what you like? I think it is. So I don't mind people wanting to change the color of their skin if that's what they want to do, as much as I don't mind them wanting to change their gender, if that's what suits them, great.
Since race is 100% a social construct much more so than Gender (the difference between the genes are stupidly small). The ethnicity argument is largely one about cultural appropriation: You can't have my skin color because you weren't born with it, you're actually another color, you don't know what it means to be my skin color. (Just replace skin color with gender). You can't listen to X music or wear X hair style because it's X skin color thing.
You enjoy R&B, love black hair styles, love black skin tones, maybe you believe in your heart you were always black, go right ahead have at. I'm not going to judge you.
You want to mock black people and dance around in full minstrel while doing a monkey dance with bananas just for laughs... I'm not cool with that. Just as I'm not a huge far of people dressing up as women to caricaturize/mock them as part of a stand up act.
No. I'm very much are of why the genders are separated to begin with. These people are not very well educated, they don't have a great never mind positive peer group, they are riddled with attitudes that you would expect of prisoners, drugs, mental health issues and so on... this applies to both men and women.
As long as the inmate has human contact, whether staff, visitors, volunteers etcetera they do not need to be in gen pop. For their own safety and rehabilitation.
The whole reason why they're in prison, is because the judge believes they are a risk to society, whether trans, male/female or whatever. I think everyone should have a fair chance of being rehabilitated without the additional problems that come from them being trans. Whether this is caused from the inmate themselves, or because the fears that the population has. Their best chance of rehabilitation is to be among other trans prisoners (best option) with possible supervised interactions with their adopted gender to ensure that they will be able to adapt to life outside of prison.
Putting them in gen pop is usually a bad idea.
Prison is at least 10x worse for trans bashing, no matter which gender.
It's a little more equivalent than most seem to be considering.
Her point is not about caricature either way, in fact the opposite. She's assuming that the individual would be wearing black face in good faith. Blackface isn't always about caricature, we see this most frequently in Hollywood, but it wouldn't be the first time I've seen a white person wearing dreadlocks or even a traditional Nigerian outfit. Blackface itself is a little rarer, but being tanned to look like someone from the Mediterranean is still very popular, likewise White-face is an entire make-up industry with various skin lightening products. It's okay to want to make yourself look white but woe betide anyone wants to actually look black, nope, must be a caricature.
What do you do if a white kid wants to be a dark elf at a party? Same goes for cosplayers.
The point Rowling was making, well okay, if it's not acceptable under any circumstances to attempt to change your race, even if you 'feel' like that race, then why is it acceptable to change the gender. To Rowling, it's no different, she feels just as offended that 'men' are dressing up as women, pretending to be women, as everyone else seems be about people dressing up in blackface, no matter how well intentioned.
Both sides of that argument are clearly wrong, good faith matters and blackface isn't always caricature... and likewise, not all people who dress as women are doing it out of the goodness of their hearts either, some fully intend to caricaturize women and often make a whole song and dance about it and is apparently hugely acceptable, often degrading women while they do so.
@ErrantRoleplayer
@lemmy.world