https://unitedwaynca.org/blog/vacant-homes-vs-homelessness-by-city/
Many overpriced homes sit vacant while populations experiencing homelessness continue to grow in the U.S. See which cities have the highest disparity here.
There is a discussion on Hacker News, but feel free to comment here as well.
Seems like the excess housing may not be where the homeless people are. Like it's great that there are 110 vacant houses for every homeless person in Detroit, but how is that helpful to Los Angeles's homeless population?
They mention that both Syracuse and Detroit have a ton of extra housing and then say that Los Angeles has the highest percentage of homeless people. No mention of how many vacant houses there are in LA compared to homeless people. Unless they are suggesting we ship the homeless from California to Michigan, I'm not sure what they are suggesting in this article.
Oh no we couldn't do that! What we're just going to do something Singapore already does, and has been shown to actually work?
I like the idea, but no good way for this to work out.
Small time landlords with a few properties will get fucked out of existence while massive corporations will get their overpriced lawyers to find a loophole and not pay a dime in taxes despite owning thousands of properties. Then they will just buy up the rest of real estate that small time landlords can't afford now because of taxes.
There's a 0% chance gov can implement this tax correctly, but even if by some random chance they do, corporations will simply pass it down to renters.
How many are corporate owned?
Oh wait, you dropped this:
Large institutions owned roughly 5% of the 14 million single-family rentals nationally in early 2022, according to analysts. By 2030, the institutions may hold some 7.6 million homes, or more than 40% of all single-family rentals on the market, according to the 2022 forecast by MetLife Investment Management.