things don't exist until they have a name
also naming things is bad because we don't need new words for things
also naming things is bad because we don't need new words for things
damn what's the Académie Française doing writing in english on a communist forum?
These gentlemen think that when we have given names to things we have created the things themselves. This is how these profound thinkers mock at the whole world.
they were also homophobic, ableist, anti semetic, racist, etc
Is quite the argument. If you hold a lot of bigoted views, you can't be bigoted in one specific way?
If you hate enough different minorities, they all cancel each other out like Mr. Burns' viruses
negative intersectionality, where one prejudice connects you to and makes you hold all the others 
thoughSee the taxonomic hierarchy of patriarchal white supremacy means it can't be bigoted towards any specific category, because all those sub categories are group together via exclusion from the hierarchy by definition. They just hate a bunch of those groups generally, but not like specifically.
While the Soviets had pretty mixed LGBT reputation, they did kill almost every prominent genocidal homophobe in Russia in 1917 from frothing Orthodox Priests to asshole noblewomen to every fucking Black Hundred they could find.
I don't believe in "discrimination," and I don't believe in -isms. As I've said before, whether it's "racism," "homophobia," or "transphobia," these are liberal concepts whose sole function is that as heresies under liberal capitalism (which is why you won't find same level of persecution of any of them, on a societal or state level, in less liberal states; E.G., China, Russia, Iran).
By not acknowledging that homophobia is a thing, you're actually not being homophobic when executing homosexuals.