So now we're buying the article of clothing, the branding on said clothing and precision tools to remove the branding from the article of clothing.
Not throwing shade at you specifically. That's a clever solution, I just kinda hate that this problem demands even more shit in order to get around.
It is however a classic trope. Being "one of the good ones," affords certain privileges until is doesn't. It is also absolutely a despicable card to play.
Say that's true. Do you then actually believe that if you're not smart or you "don't have drive," you somehow deserve to be unhoused or starve, to be unable to access healthcare?
I'm all for people improving their lives, but as a baseline I just don't believe that certain people deserve the consequences of horrible poverty just because they didn't or couldn't perform academically.
Also what's the justification for having a system that allows employers to exploit workers by paying poverty wages while materially benefiting from that labor?
I mean, that's fine, but as a Linux user I've fucked around a lot and spent a lot of time fixing mistakes that I did not need to make.
I think I'm a pretty average Linux user. Who needs something that "just works" when you can break it by trying to add something you don't need?
That's really interesting.
I see people doubling the limit in school/construction zones or reduced speed residential areas all the time. This would be a massive detterent.
@twig
@lemmy.dbzer0.com