The Constitution says nothing about them being charged. It talks about them "engaging" in that behavior but there is no requirement for being charged with or convicted of that behavior. The Supreme Court is making this all up as they go.
You make some excellent points and I want to say that I think it is really unfortunate you got hit by the downvote bus.
When I say illegal immigrants I'm talking about the way they entered the country. Illegal is an adverb in this situation because it describes the way they immigrated.
In the future I'll try to use "illegally immigrating persons" so as to make this absurdly clear.
It is very telling when the laws are used to dissuade and punish the illegal immigrants for working instead of the companies and corporations for hiring them. If you make illegal labor unprofitable then you will largely get rid of it.
Well you're definitely slinging a bunch of bullshit around without any proof so why not just STFU? When you are getting massive downvotes for your incorrect claims you double-down and start calling names?! This is a clear sign of somebody who isn't worth listening to or their ideas/opinions worth regarding.
In order to prove this you would need a huge sample poll from each religion and it would need to be representative of the size of each flavor. Then and only then could you begin to make that kind of generalized statement.
Judging a group of people by one of its members is wrong, it's the same form of prejudice.
@stown
@sedd.it