A president can’t really unilaterally end support for Israel
Really?
Biden unilaterally went around Congress for an arms shipment...
It only works one way?
Not to mention you didn't address a single thing I mentioned...
I said:
Kamala is the VP and candidate for president, why wouldn’t she be able to talk to voters about America’s support of genocide?
And you came away with:
A president can’t really unilaterally end support for Israel
In what world is listening to th Dem voting base on policy preference "unilaterally end support for Israel"?
Did you mean to reply to me?
That's pretty cool. When there's not enough water they just start dropping minis that may have enough to survive.
Better than waiting for the whole plant to die.
That would make sense if she wasn't saying anything about the genocide...
Instead she's running misleading videos that are edited to make it sound like she supports Gaza. While cutting out the parts about never stopping support to Israel, who have been committing a genocide in Gaza for almost a year now
If Trump did that, we'd all call him out for lying, especially if while.doing that he refused to meet with anyone.
Kamala is the VP and candidate for president, why wouldn't she be able to talk to voters about America's support of genocide?
What other political stances isn't she allowed to talk about?
First sign of the Royal British Legion is you don't talk about the Royal British Legion
They've already flattened Gaza and turned their eyes to the next target.
This week saw two concurrent days of unprecedented attacks on Hezbollah operatives throughout Lebanon, with the explosion of communications devices used by members causing the deaths of dozens and injuries of thousands. Hezbollah has blamed Israel for the attacks and has vowed a response, raising the specter of further escalation in the conflict.
They're not gonna stop. As long as America keeps supporting them, they'll keep lashing at at everyone close and causing a new generation of terrorists so they can keep doing it indefinitely.
Fascists can't ever beat their enemies, or they need to invent new ones. That's why Bibi is suddenly fine letting Hamas leaders leave. So they can come back later.
would be “fuck yeah I do!”
I'm not a huge fan of Pete, but at least he's smart enough to have learned that lesson from Bernie.
He goes on Faux all the time these days and when they call him a communist, he explains what the policy actually means.
The vast majority of our country want healthcare improved. And I stead of capitalizing on it, were letting trump be the only one who talks about fixing it. Knowing that half the voters are dumb enough to believe him
It's fucked up there's no option to vote for who actually wants to fix it.
Kamala was headed in the right direction 5 years ago, but now I dont even know if she admits the current system am is flawed now.
and in mid 1960’s they suddenly became “palestinians”,
Because a bunch of white people in London gave their homeland to a bunch of other ethnically Europeans and forced them into a smaller area and named it Palestine...
I have no idea why that matters, but I skipped the insult and just address the first false thing in your comment.
Edit:
Nevermind, I looked at the mods account, this is a sub for propaganda.
You'll fit right in
Literally all Kamala has to do is hear them out.
If she wouldn't have backed out of letting them speak at the DNC, we wouldn't even be talking about this still.
Expectations are really that low that all it would take is listening.
Unfortunately she's taken a page out of Biden and Hillary's book; if you don't have an R next to your name, she's not trying to get your vote.
MBFC:
Newsrael covers Israeli and regional news with emotionally loaded language, such as this: “WATCH: Rashida Tlaib has meltdown when asked to condemn ‘Death to America’ chants.” The video report headline suggests a bias against Rashida Tlaib by portraying her reaction as a “meltdown,” a term loaded with negative connotations. The phrase “asked to condemn” also implies an expectation of moral judgment, which can frame Tlaib’s response in a particular light before the details are known. The headline uses emotive language and framing that could lead readers to form a biased perception of Rashida Tlaib’s response without necessarily providing context or details of the incident.
When covering the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, they hold one-sided views, such as this: “PA Chooses to Fund Terrorists but Not Heart Disease Patients.” The article title and content suggest a strong bias against the Palestinian Authority (PA). It frames the Palestinian Authority’s actions in a negative light, particularly by emphasizing its alleged prioritization of funding for terrorists over healthcare services. This framing aligns with a narrative often found in pro-Israel discourse, which tends to emphasize security concerns related to terrorism and criticize Palestinian leadership.
But its obviously propaganda from the title and website name tho
@givesomefucks
@lemmy.world