It's because our whole society is built around having a car. There is no real alternative. Taking away a license inflicts a major burden on them. The idea that "driving is a privilege, not a right" is a cruel joke.
I had a friend who's mom had a seizure while driving. Her foot jammed the accelerator to the floor while going downhill. She didn't hit anyone, and survived the inevitable crash, but there wasn't much left of the car. It was likely going to happen again, and yet the state did not take away her license. Now, the family was responsible and made sure she didn't have to drive anymore, but not everyone has a responsible and proactive family like that. There are almost certainly people with similar medical issues driving around right now, and it keeps me awake at night. Not even an uncontrollable medical issue that makes you a rolling time bomb is enough.
Mostly, yes.
I'd like to find a better way to phrase "why aren't you . . . " questions. It carries an accusatory tone in text, even if you don't intend that. The answer is almost invariably going to be either "I didn't know it existed" or "because reason X". Neither case justifies the accusatory tone. Maybe if the "I didn't know it existed" answer was something so basic that they really should have known it existed, but probably not even then.
FWIW, you're not totally off. There's a direct link between JWs and Adventists, though JWs don't like to admit it.
Niven actually wrote them in himself, but the animated series has a loose connection to the rest of canon. There were rumors that Enterprise was going to introduce them properly before it got canceled.
I can accept that the US is doing bad things. Can you accept that China is doing bad things?
The two are interrelated. Charles Taze Russel (founder of what is now called the Jehovah's Witnesses) was associated with the Millerites. Lots of their doctrine was copied from the 7th Day Adventists, including the numerology of the timeline that gets them to 1914 as "the" year. That one was supposed to be just a step along the way, but after WWI happened, it was a lot of pointing and saying "see, we predicted something big would happen".
They're also building 95% of the world's new coal plants: https://www.carbonbrief.org/china-responsible-for-95-of-new-coal-power-construction-in-2023-report-says/
New coal construction has basically stopped everywhere else, including the US.
"Per capita" is also doing some heavy lifting. Nature doesn't care about per capita. It cares about overall output, and China's is enormous. They'd need to produce over four times less co2 on a per capita basis to be equivalent to US output. They're closer to two times.
@frezik
@midwest.social