Ok, now I'm not a linguist and also not English, but in my opinion there's a difference. "People" is a broad undefined group. "Persons" is a more defined group.
Adding "those" in front also alienates them further. So by saying "those people", you are distancing yourself from them, despite them being your family. That is the amusing part for the person you talked to. You mildly insulted your family.
In a similar vain, "some people say" all the stuff that you won't to be heard saying yourself, even if it's your own opinion.
Or in some places (this might be more local) using "you"or even "one" instead of "me" when answering personal questions. For instance if someone asks: "How does it make you feel?" and answered: "It makes you feel sad" then the person answering it is distancing themselves from their own answer by literally answering on behalf on some unknown "you" when they should be using "me". Using "people" is sort of the same just on behalf of someone else.
Private institutioner og offentlige institutioner får som udgangspunkt de samme ressourcer. Pengene følger barnet, så indtægten for institutionerne er den samme for de samme børn.
Forskellen er de rigide krav til offentlige institutioner og alle de overhead omkostninger som ligger i at have en høj hierarkisk struktur. Altså, chefen for chefen for chefen for chefen skal også betales fra de samme midler.
Dér kan private institutioner spare på omkostningerne, fordi de har fladere struktur og færre krav at leve op til. De har tilgengæld profit, som også er penge der forsvinder opad.
Jeg vil ikke entydigt sige at private institutioner har bedre ressourceudnyttelse, men de har muligheden for det. Jeg føler dog en vis sikkerhed i at de offentlige institutioner er omfattet af flere krav, og at disse også bliver kontrolleret.
Personalemæssigt er det heller ikke så ringe endda under det offentlige. Der er ofte gode muligheder for at få uddannelse og avancere, hvilket kan være vanskeligt i en privat institution. Omvendt så favner det offentlige desværre også bunden af tønden, fordi det er sværere for dem at komme af med dårlige ansatte, som ville få sparket i en privat institution.
Den helt store synder er altså den offentlige administration, som desværre er nødvendig når alt og alle har deres demokratiske ret til at bestemme over hvad de foretager sig i det offentlige.
Seems like a good idea. It's not like any cars or busses actually drive there, being all stuck in congestion anyway.
Det vil undre mig hvis ikke mentorerne får noget feedback under alle omstændigheder, og bliver stillet krav til hvad de bør kunne.
Frivillig arbejde er generelt blevet sjældent, hvilket er tydeligt i alle foreninger for sport, fritidsaktiviteter, hobbies, besøgsvenner osv.. Hvis der stilles krav til det frivillige arbejde, så falder flere fra.
Hvis ikke man gider eller ikke har evnerne og overskud til at være mentor, så tror jeg ikke at penge kan gøre forskellen.
Hvis det bliver lavet om til et betalt arbejde, så skal mentorerne naturligvis være kvalificeret til arbejdet, og så er vi tilbage ved at det egentlig er skolerne som skal løse opgaven. Det er der nok ikke politisk enighed om, og så bliver det skåret væk på et tidspunkt. Det kan også udvikle sig til at alle vil have en mentor, for hvis kommunen betaler for nogen, hvorfor må nogen andre så ikke osv. Folk går i små sko når det offentlige betaler.
Men altså, som du siger i din første kommentar, så er det skolernes opgave, som ikke er løst godt nok, men det er ikke unormalt at frivillige træder til, når det offentlige ikke gør.. Se f.eks. Natteravnene: Det burde jo være politiets opgave at patruljere nattelivet. Mange brandmænd og andre dele af beredskabet er også frivillige.
Yup, that's how it's done when there's a heat exchanger.
However there's a reason why the boiler room is usually locked off in a 30 story building. Bleeding a radiator might be relatively harmless, but there's no way of knowing what the pressure is supposed to be without knowing the entire system.
Some (lower) buildings might even have direct district heating without an exchanger, which is absolutely no go to even bleed.
It's the next step in the narcissist prayer.
Next week they'll blame it on someone else, but you need bear with them; they're a little slow.
I can't find anything on differences in indoor hygiene causing a difference to the immune system. Homeschooled children will still be exposed to the same viruses through their parents or anyone else. It may very well be a misunderstood study from the 80s. It is currently neither confirmed or proven wrong.
However I've found a slightly different study. It compares children who go to conventional kindergartens to children in outdoor kindergartens. I'm not sure if you're familiar with that these "forest-kindergardens", but the general idea is that the kids are outside all day. Due to the need for warm clothing and constantly getting dirty, they usually wear the same outdoor suit throughout the week. They're exposed to natural bacteria a lot more, but less so to airborne viruses.
So it's not exactly the same thing you asked for, but it does show a difference in their immune systems.
https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.aba2578
Another study showing the same thing through a different comparison of children in rural vs. suburban areas.
https://www.ucc.ie/en/news/2023/rural-environment-supports-childrens-immune-systems.html
That depends entirely on how the system is set up. I would only ever consider increasing the amount of water in the system if I was absolutely certain that my apartment was on a completely separate and closed circuit than the other apartments. You should contact the janitor or whatever it's called.
Hmm. I just tested it in Excel. "No fill" will make it transparent. White would cover the grid lines.
So, I guess it's doable using a set of columns with identical colours. Calculating the values from a picture would also be possible - for a mad man.
@bstix
@feddit.dk