@Whattrees
@lemmy.blahaj.zoneThen your definition of pacifism is inherently flawed. You condensed at least 100 years of discussion by philosophers (and likely thousands of years of discussion from Asian religious groups that have "do no harm" as a tenant) into a single "pacifism is when you never fight back or fight to protect others". Only one type of pacifism defines itself that way.
Are you arguing that things would be better if every country invaded by another rolled over and accepted the aggression of the other?
You also have a right to collect Nazi memorabilia if you want, doesn't mean I'm not going to call you weird.
Do you think there might be anything different between collecting swords and collecting guns? Do you think most people who live in urban environments have a need for a semi-auto military style, magazine-fed rifle? What about multiple of them? What about machine guns?
This isn't ground news, it is MBFC. They don't use AI for their ratings, and they aren't vc funded. Literally both of those are next to each other on their about page if you cared to look.
Once again, the bot is giving you free information about the media source in the bot with more info linked on their site for free. You are free to ignore or block it. I just don't understand throwing a fit about the existence of a bot designed to help users understand media bias for free.
If the mere existence of free and helpful information makes you so upset, just block it and walk away.
Media Bias Fact Check, the source for the info the bot gives is not ground news. It's one of ground news' sources. They are not connected in any meaningful sense.
Also, it's not an ad, it gives you all the information right in the bot for free and links to the site with more info for free. They aren't encouraging you or even suggesting donating to or buying ground news or mbfc.
Lastly, just block the account if you don't want to see it. I have no idea why people are so upset at a bot for giving them free, helpful information they can choose to ignore or block.
I got mine for a hyper-specific food allergy issue years ago. We still use it occasionally. It is tremendously powerful in how you can dial in a specific cook temp that allows for more tender meat than most other preparation methods, but it also involves a bit more setup and teardown than I like for most simple after-work style meals. I would recommend it if you have things in mind already and expect to get good use out of it.
You're not dog whistling, you're just certain that something fishy is going on when one athlete is bigger and stronger than another. You clearly are trying to imply something, why not just woman-up and say it?
The people whose job it is to decide already did and she qualified. What more is there to do, unless you think they need to look at it again because they got it wrong?
Yes, you totally have no opinion on it whatsoever which is why you vague-posted a "just asking questions" type comment on here.