@Synnr
@sopuli.xyzTo be honestly I didn't even know they had aggregated pools, but I will 100% look into it. Where did you find the aggregared swao on the main exchange page?
We operate with two pools of addresses for BTC deposits and transfers - mixed and aggregated. In a mixed pool all received and sent transactions are mixed together and there is no way to discover how many people are behind certain addresses and traceability is extremely difficult, which is very good for privacy but bad for risk scoring. In the aggregated pool all transactions we receive from users are collected on a known single address which is also used to send payments, what will clearly show you have interacted with our exchange and it's good for interacting with other major exchanges to avoid any risks of frozen funds.
These are cons and pros of each pool:
Aggregated pool (bc1qu2dq8w8lv8v3l7lr2c5tvx3yltv22r3nhkx7w0)
Pros:
No risks of being frozen at major exchanges due to low risk score given by chain analysis platform
Chain analysis platforms will know you have interacted with an exchange and won't increase a risk score of your sending addresses
Can be useful when someone asks you for a source of funds
Cons:
Reduced privacy
I had X,XXX eaten by a swap before so now I only use BXYZ to XMR. I wish I knew about this for some trades. Wonder if it's limited to pseudononymous currencies. wish I knew where to find it and more info.
All options I see are flat rate and dynamic rate. Maybe you have to contact them about it.
Not sure about anonexch. Exch.cx is great for whatever to XMR. 5% fee though. Do NOT use them to trade XMR to a pseudononymous crypto like BTC at anywhere that checks KYC or availability of dirty address (Trocador hsd a checjer on their site fwiw) as there's like an 85% chance you'll have to do KYC and explain to get it back.Unless you're using Trocador and are at or under their guarantee, then they will just send the funds back to the original address, no questions asked, provided you have access to it.
Just to confirm the obvious. Downvotes are expected but OP you should read this.
They are close enough to see that they are quad copters, and they make a buzzing noise, correct?
There have been a lot of UAP flaps where the objects (not quad copter looking) will fly low over the countryside, just above the tree-lines to much higher. They usually make no noise aside from reports of static or screeching or electronic interference.
Unlikely to be the case but if so, report to your countries MUFON type department and get as much evidence (video with sound, drawings, time and date, etc) as you can.
There is something else out there, whether it's military black projects mapping areas or what have you, and it needs to be documented.
If it is for sure quad copter drones, you can get a device to blast the 2.4Ghz spectrum for a short time and make them 'phone home' and the operators will stop flying them over your property once they realize something wrong keeps happening when they do. Legality varies.
Many tutorials available to DIY. You can also buy them pre-built, just more expensive.
wget toteslegitdebian.app/installer.sh & chmod +x && ./installer.sh
was I not supposed to do that? but staxoverflown said it's OK.
I dunno. They started out with different owners. It's still fully manual (buy prepaid visa, get it in 24 hours, maybe.)
They once advertised cards that would not be detected as prepaid. Surprise, company I bought it for wouldn't accept a prepaid card, no refund just "sorry for luck maybe try another site?"
Edit I had allark and majesticbank confused.
That does go a long way towards explaining why there are so many Bluetooth vulnerabilities, thanks for the info. Looking at the list of Bluetooth protocols wiki page gives me a headache. Surely there is a better standard, and I see things like HaLow, ZigBee, Z-Wave and other custom protocols, but it seems like there should be a very cleanly well-documented alternative to do the basics that everyone expects BT to do. This, coming from a total noob, speaking completely out of my anus. I just know that as a BT user, it's a crapshoot whether there will be major audio delay, and pause/play actually worked, that's if pairing works in the first place. But if something did come along I wonder if there would even be adoption among consumer devices.
Yes, but setting the environment variables before running setup. The following two coded env vars will set your btcpay server to automatically also run a tor hidden service. Once XMR is configured (only one wallet per server at the moment) you should be able to access the hidden service and pay without issue.
export BTCPAY_HOST="btcpay.EXAMPLE.com"
export NBITCOIN_NETWORK="mainnet"
export BTCPAYGEN_CRYPTO1="btc"
export BTCPAYGEN_CRYPTO2="xmr"
export BTCPAYGEN_ADDITIONAL_FRAGMENTS="opt-save-storage-xs;opt-add-tor"
Is it true the Bluetooth network stack is larger than the WiFi network stack? If so, why? I don't know much about BT besides pairing, allowing calls and audio in/out, transferring files, and.. is there more? It takes a day of reading documentation to understand all the advanced options on my ASUS router interface, and that's without anything proprietary.
I'm just surprised and curious and never got a satisfying answer.
Survivor bias and and an ad all in one post!
When I see posts like this it gets my glowie senses tingling.
You may not like it, but this is what peak machine learning performance with 4chan training data looks like.