If it's being operated over a home then it will almost certainly have to follow the rules on Operation Over People and those can be quite restrictive, especially for drones that weigh more than .55lbs.
That is incorrect... If you actually read the law you are trying to reference you will learn it's a prohibition on flying over "open-air assemblies of people" and if you read the final rule report (found on the very bottom of the page you linked under resources) on page 128 & 129 you will see how the FAA classifies "open-air assemblies of people".
The FAA received a few comments addressing the proposal to prohibit Category 3
operations over open-air assemblies of people. One commenter recommended the FAA clarify
what it means by an “assembly of people” and provide a quantity or density of people that
constitute a significant risk. The FAA has declined to define this term by regulation; rather, the
FAA employs a case-by-case approach in determining how to apply the term “open-air
assembly.”58 Whether an operational area is an open-air assembly is evaluated by considering the
density of people who are not directly participating in the operation of the small unmanned
aircraft and the size of the operational area. Such assemblies are usually associated with public
spaces. The FAA considers some potential examples of open-air assemblies may include
sporting events, concerts, parades, protests, political rallies, community festivals, or parks and
beaches during certain events. Some potential examples that are less likely to be considered
open-air assemblies include individual persons or families exiting a shopping center, athletes
participating in friendly sports in an open area without spectators, individuals or small groups
taking leisure in a park or on a beach, or individuals walking or riding a bike along a bike path,
but whether an open-air assembly exists depends on a case-by-case determination based on the facts and circumstances of each case.
While the FAA refused to strictly give a definition, what was provided is enough to construed that private property does not constitute an "open-air assemblies of people".