Because there is no intelligence in it.
Yeah, thanks for saying this. Current AI has literally 0 intelligence whatsoever. It’s basically just pattern matching. People are getting all hyped up about these chatbots, when they are literally just pattern matching, glorified autocompletes.
Even if it’s just zero degradation in the first 5 years, that still seems like a big deal.
This sounds like marketing hype.
Yeah, this is exactly my thoughts aswell. If AI truly had reasoning capabilities, it would be global front page news.
IMO, too far out for this discussion to matter. Our primitive chemical rockets are absolutely nowhere close to facilitating routine trips to the asteroid belt, and we probably won’t get the sort of rocket technology that would, for at least decades, so that’s around late 2040’s (very optimistically), to 2050s at the earliest / 2060s? Yeah, very far out.
I’ve noticed that a lot of the things debated about in futurist circles are either a very long time away, or probably beyond our lifetimes. It’s a shame.
I get what you’re trying to say, but making fire and understanding the human brain are not even remotely on the same level.
How exactly are we supposed to replicate the human brain, when we barely understand it?
@Phoenix5869
@futurology.today