No, he is critical of labor with the caviet we can't piss off daddy don USA and so labors position is reasonable.
He has a point, is what it is, the nail that sticks out gets hammered down. And I'd prefer a competent government over a coalition of corrupt, idiotic scammers
That would be good. Non binary was rare among the queer community when I was a teen. Already, friends have asked me to chat with their kids who are coming out. I don't have much to say, they're more onto it than I ever was. I was surprised by the number until you mentioned it's more common now
Haha, I agree, he's a mixed bag.
It's nothing you wouldn't be aware of, but it's good to see some awareness raising.
I think medical advancement could be as dramatic this century was in the last. However, patent law is likely to hold us back
Yeah, that's why the Greens opposed prescription. They aren't as subject to the Murdoch media cycle so they're free to point out the issues with criminalisation from an evidence based practice perspective.
So they're looking to defund the vape industry. Likely to allow further changes in the future.
Labor left the legislation open to charge individuals before the Greens pulled them up on it.
At least the Greens prevented a black market from centralising to organised crime, but if they think this is going to stop an online-first generation from accessing vapes they're dreaming.
That's the point of the court ruling right? It recognises the current climate when determining safety and disadvantage, not the past.
This comment seems contentious. Are the differences in opinion political? An ideological opposition?
.
Thank you for your comment, it provided more context than the article
@Kayel
@aussie.zone