@Edo_Secco
@lemmy.mlI would like to share a thought (based on canonical information as much as possible) about healing by the Force seen in Ep9 and which has caused so much discussion.
I have always thought of it as very simple: the ability to heal is achieved by mastering the Living Force (which is one of the two aspects of the Force, the other being the Cosmic Force) and learning to "channel" it. As I understand from the prequels, the study of the Cosmic Force was very prevalent, while the study of the Living Force was lapsed and followed by a minority current of Jedi (e.g., the very first dialogue between Qui-Gon and Obi-Wan in Ep1). One aspect of mastering the Living force is maintaining one's self-awareness even after death (thus being able to manifest as a Force ghost), another may well be the ability to elicit healing from physical damage in living tissue. Anakin could not save his mother because, while potentially powerful, he knew nothing about it. Even Sidious did not know about it, which gives me pause as to how even the Sith as far as studying the Force were no better off than the Jedi, although then he must have learned something because in Ep9 he manages to absorb the Living Force from Ben and Rey to toughen his decaying body. While in the Ahch-To texts Rey found the ancient indications to that effect and learned it (and perhaps Plagueis similarly, or re-discovered it on his own). In Yoda's species this ability might be innate (Grogu heals Karga) but after a very long time spent considering almost only the Cosmic Force the master almost forgot it. Am I making it too simple? 🙃
I would like to share a thought (based on canonical information as much as possible) about healing by the Force seen in Ep9 and which has caused so much discussion.
I have always thought of it as very simple: the ability to heal is achieved by mastering the Living Force (which is one of the two aspects of the Force, the other being the Cosmic Force) and learning to "channel" it. As I understand from the prequels, the study of the Cosmic Force was very prevalent, while the study of the Living Force was lapsed and followed by a minority current of Jedi (e.g., the very first dialogue between Qui-Gon and Obi-Wan in Ep1). One aspect of mastering the Living force is maintaining one's self-awareness even after death (thus being able to manifest as a Force ghost), another may well be the ability to elicit healing from physical damage in living tissue. Anakin could not save his mother because, while potentially powerful, he knew nothing about it. Even Sidious did not know about it, which gives me pause as to how even the Sith as far as studying the Force were no better off than the Jedi, although then he must have learned something because in Ep9 he manages to absorb the Living Force from Ben and Rey to toughen his decaying body. While in the Ahch-To texts Rey found the ancient indications to that effect and learned it (and perhaps Plagueis similarly, or re-discovered it on his own). In Yoda's species this ability might be innate (Grogu heals Karga) but after a very long time spent considering almost only the Cosmic Force the master almost forgot it. Am I making it too simple? 🙃
https://cryptpad.devol.it/sheet/#/2/sheet/view/f6mrujb3X5+pH0DDL3FRgxN1H6dto-tAwlThGsPR37k/embed/
https://www.spreaker.com/show/beradio
Nonostante io abbia (quasi) 33 anni, fin da ragazzino sono stato un assiduo collezionista degli albi degli irriducibili Galli, e ad oggi posso dire di averli tutti in bella mostra in libreria, parte dei quali originali degli anni '60 e '70. È innegabile che fino a "Asterix e i Belgi" si senta il piglio di Goscinny nelle storie, che Uderzo ha tentato con alterne fortune di mantenere dopo la scomparsa dell'amico e collega; io personalmente le ho apprezzate abbastanza, se non altro per lo sforzo di tenere in piedi la serie da solo. Veniamo ora agli ultimi albi, di Ferri e Conrad, "Il papiro di Cesare" bellissima la conclusione con il richiamo a Goscinny e Uderzo ❤️; "La corsa d'Italia" vi giuro che ad un certo punto la lettura mi aveva proprio preso, dovevo rallentarmi per non leggerlo troppo di corsa 😃, "La figlia di Vercingetorige" temevo una rappresentazione stereotipata dell'adolescenza ma è andata ancora bene, è particolare la conclusione quasi fiabesca. "I Pitti" e "Il Grifone" sono quelli che mi hanno preso di meno, non so, non decollavano se non in qualche gag qua e là.
Sometimes I think that vocational discernment should be "mandatory": such a fundamental part of a Christian's life journey cannot be left to individual initiative, but should be an integral part of Christian initiation, which in my opinion should continue until after the age of 20 (with the Confirmation). Here in Italy, many young people, even good Catholic, are not naturally led to question themselves about their vocation (whether it be consecrated life, marriage, priesthood, or none of them).
Può sembrare una brutta provocazione anti-democratica, ma è solo un dubbio sincero. Spero lo prendiate in quanto tale.
Ho cercato se se ne fosse già parlato qui, ma non ho trovato niente, in caso contrario mi scuso.
Ho avuto un pensiero improvviso: mettiamo che una certa questione venga approvata o affossata da un referendum; nel giro di, mettiamo, una ventina d'anni la popolazione votante può cambiare e anche di molto, a seconda della mortalità di chi era in là con l'età e dei bambini e ragazzi che sono diventati maggiorenni nel frattempo.
Per non parlare dei cambiamenti di mentalità, delle scoperte scientifiche nel caso la questione referendaria fosse stata di quell'ambito, ecc.
Alla luce di questo, come considerare la valenza di un risultato referendario con progressivo passare degli anni?
Davvero, prendetelo come un dubbio sincero, io non mi ritengo il più brillante degli esseri umani, quindi è probabile che sia la domanda a essere posta male.
Grazie a chi risponderà!