@CubitOom
@infosec.pubHow easy is it to decomp these games? I really want to play Star Wars Episode I: Racer on Linux with raytracing and all that.
Excellent point.
starts listening the bomb rush cyberfunk ost and wonders what it would be like to switch the soundtrack for both games
Second step: Use an army of Picardos as mining slaves.
The federation has a lot of stuff to make and no money to pay.
I've been parcooking rice like this for about 3 years now. It's very little effort and doesn't change the rice enough to matter.
I've been digging a trench for overflow water from my rain storage to a nearby swale. I found a clay deposit and have been storing any clumps I dig up so I can process into something I can make into fermentation jars later. I totally had this thought, knowing full well that my father won't understand anything about what I'm doing, my ancient homos get me.
I like this idea in concept. However in most cases failure is mostly due to power loss. So unless these seprate systems have different power sources it might not protect from catastrophy that much.
As some one who does aquaponics at home. Here are some things ive learned which you might consider.
For these reasons, I use aquaponics more as a backup and complimentary grow system to my no till regenative garden. Having an indoor system is great in the winter if you want leafy greens or to proprpgate trees for the next season.
But, you know if a business changes to dynamic pricing and their next quarterly numbers shows that the vast majority of people didn't swallow it, and revenue is hugely down, they would undo it in a second.
You would be right if we assume that
However once a company is a certain size or in the correct position it's more about showing a growth potential to investors, then actually proffiting from selling goods/services. Investors is really how these companies make money now. I'm not an economist so I'm not sure if this is still technically capitalism when the majority of profits come straight from investors but to me it sounds much more like a ponzi scheme.
My point being is that in a best case scenario, a nationwide boycott could take place and a company makes $0 gross income. But they can still profit if they can convince their investors that they are taking the right steps to position themselves in "this new economy". Now realistically someone is still going to buy their products and any boycott effort will just have minor effects. The absolute worst case scenario for anyone actually in charge of making decisions like this at a large company is they get a golden parachute and hop over to another place.
Just like you said, why would they turn down free money?