Fennecs can be barely tamed.
You cannot domesticate something. Domestication requires hundreds of years of selective breeding and conditioning.
These are all wild animals, leave them in the wild. No one should own these animals except research institutions, rehabilitation centers, and reputable zoos.
Also this better be satire. That last picture is not an ostrich, that is a Cassowary and that thing will literally just straight up murder you. It can gut a human so fast you'd be dead before you even realized what is going on. They are aggressive, dangerous, and extremely unpredictable wild animals.
The only animal on this list that would be a good pet is the Axolotl, but they are very misunderstood and if you don't do the research and spend A LOT of money, it will suffer and have a horrible miserable life.
Reminder that all "wild pigeons" are actually domesticated offspring that were abandoned by humanity when carrier pigeons were rendered obsolete.
This is why "wild" pigeons are not afraid of humans and love human contact/being pets.
This is blatantly not true. Some of the most radical and active members of the left are part of the LGBT community.
The ISU-152’s name in Russian quite literally includes the word tank. Casemates, SPGs, and tank destroyers are still tanks.
“Самоходная установка на базе танка ИС с орудием калибра 152мм, ИСУ-152“
“IS tank based self-propelled installation with 152mm caliber gun.”
Quite the mouthful.
It also checks out on the definition front, “a heavy armored fighting vehicle carrying guns and moving on a continuous articulated metal track“.
"Full war economy" is an insane mobilization of all aspects of a county's industrial capability, and if the US were to undertake such an endeavor it would near instantly implode. This is not very unique to the US though, as modern economies are not designed around being mobilized in such a way, and there is absolutely no way to mobilize a country in such a way without causing extreme and lasting damage; which makes it unlikely for the US and its capitalists to do.
The US is also not "running dry", they have given Ukraine a tiny little bit of scrap from their pile of aging weapons that were primed to be scrapped anyways. Whatever the US is giving is quickly replaced by new war material from new contracts from the Military Industrial Complex.
Active US war itself is also incredibly unpopular, which is why even the most bloodthirsty libs immediately shy away from the thought when its brought up. This is also why the US avoids any and all direct conflict, and instead pokes and prods, and engages in proxy wars.
All in all, all of these factors combine to mean that the US simply wants a new proxy war that they can fund and run contracts off of. The possibility of launching an invasion of Iran is minimal, but the US would froth at the possibility to arm Israel if they decide to launch an attack.
They just want to sell guns, loans, and contracts. War profiteering.
Boring not in that its not interesting like a tv or movie, but banal in its presentation in that for those that aren't immediately under threat, the situation seems repetitive and uninteresting. Despite that being exactly what war is. Another striking of the banality of evil.
War is boring. There must either be something extremely important happening, or it must be continuously hyped up to be interesting.
As has been famously said; "All quiet on the western front".
@ComradeSalad
@lemmygrad.ml