"I think Biden is old and not my favorite, so I'll just stay home."
Meanwhile, Fascists are literally trying to create an oppressive dictatorship...
You'd have thought we'd have learned our lesson after 2016 but maybe not, which is goddamn terrifying.
You'd think Democrats would have learned their lesson, but they haven't.
Insane that the most people take by Dem voters seems to be "everybody is an idiot except for us, why can't they see and accept that?"
Insane that the most people take by Dem voters seems to be
If you're trying to argue you're not an idiot, using English sentences that make sense would be a good first step.
I'm not American, but I'm definitely guilty.
"I feel like the Labour Party has lost its way, and their new leader just doesn't impress me..."
cue opposition party taking power.
unicorn who?No, because I know I could never compete with The Good Book handed down to us from on high (The Art of the Deal)
Why don’t the wings let the plane hover like a helicopter? I’m just asking questions.
And do the wings really need to be that big? I've seen bumblebees and they have teeny little wings. I'm just saying, do your research!
+/- 50% of the USA is willing to vote for a dictatorship. The propaganda machine of the republicans is remarkably strong, or is it the Russians / Chinese again? The 2024 elections might be the last, real, elections for the USA.
is it the Russians
Probably not, they have their own "election" to worry about. Can't say for Chinese though.
•
Considering Pamfilova can pull any number from electronic voting, I wouldn't e as confident if I was you
True, but they still have to put up a show and try keep opposition at bay. Will be a tough one after they, you know, declared a war, lost hundreds of thousands of people and pissed off the entire world.
if only there was some place for me to express myself without reality repercussions so that I could get the feeling of "emperor has no clothes" but without all the problems of assembly and protest!
hey ... wait a minute!
WARNING. This person is being disingenuous and is arguing in bad faith.
Their purpose here is to get you to engage so they have more space to spread their propaganda. Don't fall for it.
I mean, the options are literally center-right liberal or neonazi fascist. I know what I'd pick.
Actually there are lots of options that are neither of those things. But you actually like genocide, you just aren't comfortable going mask off yet.
•
Except mathematically, no, there are not other options. One of those two options are going to win, as much as none of us like it.
You don't understand first past the post voting. Only two options can win. but those two options don't have stay the same forever and ever. If you want to change the options (by voting) you can't vote for either of the two current options and eventually one will be replaced. You can also attempt to reform the voting system, which should be done in parallel. But in the meantime the LEAST you can do is not vote for the current options.
•
You don’t understand first past the post voting.
No, you don't understand FPTP voting.
Obviously the two parties can change. But you are already in a situation where the system has collapsed into two stable parties.
So voting for a third party is going to guarantee a victory for the party you like least, because of the spoiler effect.
And with how incumbent both the Democrats and the Republicans are, and given how the Democrats actually do have a stable core voter-base who would not follow leftists over to a progressive party, you aren't actually going to dislodge the Democrats within a reasonable amount of time. You would be guaranteeing that the Republicans win the next 3-4 cycles at least, with zero contest. And those losses would lead to the progressive party losing votes back to the larger Democratic party, extending the difficult transition period.
That's why third parties are basically impossible. It requires an electorate to be willing to militantly vote to lose to the fascistic party for over a decade before there is even the possibility of replacing the incumbent neoliberal party.
Your only hope is forcing voting reform. Which... I mean good luck.
Obviously the two parties can change. But you are already in a situation where the system has collapsed into two stable parties.
Hmm, I wonder how the two stable parties can change? Do you think they are more likely to change by voting for them or not voting for them.
•
You want to address the rest of my comment, genius? The giant elephant in the room that you would be voting to lose every election for at the very least the next decade to the Republicans, with zero contest? While trying to convince neoliberals to vote for progressives?
Thanks for showing you don't know anything about me. I think Netanyahu is a fascist executing a genocide. I just also understand that the electoral system is currently designed to make it impossible for independent candidates to get into the white house. Fuck Biden, fuck Trump. But those will be the only real options.
The way to dismantle a first past the post voting system (by voting) is to not vote for either of the current choices. Obviously in addition the voting system should be reformed, by other means. But in the meantime, not voting for the current two options is the LEAST you can do.
This has to be the dumbest take I've read in a LONG time.
Like yeah, those in power are going to say "oh my, people are throwing their votes away and helping me solidify my grasp? Oh dangit, I've been foiled!"
Goodness gracious you silly goof.
Fun fact. If "those in power" do not get voted for because people didn't vote for them, then they don't get to do shit anymore because they are no longer "in power." One of the parties will collapse, and a new one will take it's place because that is how first past the post has to work. The only thing you have to do is vote for anyone but the two parties that are the current top2. That's it. It's easy, it costs you nothing.
So, all you need for your plan to work is to coordinate some 100 million folks to agree on a third party and vote on it. You see nothing nonsensical about this plan?
Everyone is dumber for having read your scribbles.
How would that dismantle the system? Like literally how? Are you just trolling or do you seriously believe that?
Problem: We have a broken voting system that two entrenched parties benefit from.
Solution: Continue to vote for the entrenched parties? That doesn't sound right. Maybe try something else?
The solution is to keep some people from setting the ship on fire for a few more years, while we build lifeboat communities with alternate care systems so that we can withdraw our money and labor from the sinking ship system in a more gradual way that minimizes global and local pain and suffering and death.
What work can we do to get that system? We aren't allowed to vote for it and neither party is interested in more competition. French-style protests might work, but our list of grievances is so long. We'd have to unite under something big...it just all feels like a long shot for our society.
Ranked choice has been put into place in some states for some elections.
Worth plugging into what some orgs are doing like fair vote
I very much disagree. We need to create public pressure to force politicians to choose a multipolar electoral system and vote for people that want to change the electoral system to be more democratic. Not voting as a protest doesn't create any incentive to change the system. Voting is the least effective means of change, but it's also the easiest means of change.
Voting for someone besides the current top two IS creating public pressure. what else would you call it?
I'm not talking about voting for public pressure. I'm talking about community organizing, protests, calling legislators, creating draft bills, etc. Civic engagement goes far beyond voting. I'm never going to discourage people from voting for their preferred candidate, but voting for independent candidates is not public pressure.
Lol, what would the internet be without its edgelord tweens?
Someone had to be the obligatory goof on this post, thanks for stepping up I guess.
Tldr; you're ineffectual and always will be until you drop your holier than thou ways :)
Ahh yes working with what works is the same as liking genocide. Very astute. You do know you sound like a petulant child right now, yeah?
You're the type of kid who can't answer the trolly problem because, in the end, someone gets hurt. There's nothing wrong with feeling the way you do, but being a judgemental whiny bitch about it is not how you get people to work together.
What the fuck works with our current "democracy" you idiot? The trolly problem has nothing to with whatver tortured analogy you are trying to make, and certainly has nothing to do with a first past the post voting system.
The only thing that voting can effect is status quo or fascists who want to make it so you can't even vote on that.
Sure, take other actions to enact change. Protest, join activist organizations, start a mutual aid group in your area, convince your coworkers to join a union, etc. Your vote is only good for these two options though, and it takes little effort to use it.
It's like saying people shouldn't protest because it's unlikely to change anything, or people shouldn't join a union because it won't destroy capitalism. Everything is part of something bigger, and choosing to just not participate in one part that you don't like because it makes you feel like you did something (while doing literally nothing) doesn't help.
What other activities do you participate in? Are you involved in unions or other unionization efforts? Do you organize protests? Do you actually do anything, or just tell people to not take the smallest effort action they can?
Yeah, but they're fake options. It doesn't do anything. Take other actions, but voting you get two choices in our system.
What meaningful action do you take, which doesn't include voting?