This is obviously a "social media manager" generating "engagement". And look at that, it works.
•
Fake, but it made me laugh. Sadly for Jersey Mike's their advertisement, however amusing, won't help as there isn't one anywhere near. Or far. Possibly really far and I'm not going that far.
Quality is about the same if we're being honest, but I can feed two people at subway for the price of one at Jersey Mike's
Are those east coast places or something? I've never seen either one.
My hierarchy is Potbelly > Jersey Mike's > Subway. There's also Jimmy John's, but I haven't been to one for a long time because I was boycotting them, but I'll have to give them a try since I found out the company changed owners.
Oh and Quiznos might still be good, but they have so few locations I thought they didn't exist anymore.
Wegmans is an East coast grocery store, but IIRC DiBella's has made it all the way to Indiana.
I mean, subway fucking exists and the bar is so low at the other ones I'm not sure if put them near the bottom. Look for a local option and check that out is always the better option for food.
One thing I will give them is the one time I went to one the produce was very fresh. Points for that. The bread sucked and the meat was spare.
I like their Phillies, but that was where Phillies weren't that common. The mall had Phillies too, and honestly I think I liked em better, but Jersey Mike's was faster to get to.
Jersey Mike's consistently has good Phillies in places that don't know how to make a good Philly. I'm also personally a fan of the club sandwich mike's way. But that's about it. Everything else I can take it or leave it.
Those Phillies though, they keep me coming back to JM's in new places.
This is an insane take. Like fuck corporations and fuck this kind of insidious marketing, but JM's is easily the very top of the chain-based sandwich restaurants
Because it's how we ended up with Elongated Muskrat thinking he's an untouchable meme lord.
I agree it's funny but just like when brands first started doing this it felt like it was a bad idea
And then there is this weird in-between that is the power bottom - the top of the bottoms.
A common misconception! Bottoming is not synonymous with passivity, only with receiving. One can be a dominant bottom, or indeed a "power bottom" who is the one actively providing most of the energy.
(No I am not going to quote IASIP)
It's weird to me that people find this concept weird or difficult to understand. It's so not.
Even seen straight porn where the woman is the more active participant, more fucking the man herself than being fucked by him? It's literally just that, but both partners are the same sex (usually; technically you could call the woman in my example a power bottom too, but nobody does).
