Lemmy instance admin concerned about decision to remove CAPTCHA amid spam waves

Open link in next tab

Admins, we're about to have a really bad SPAM problem when Lemmy removes captcha support in v.0.18 - You ALL have a responsibility to communicate back to lemmy devs to try to stop it. - tucson.social

https://tucson.social/post/15751

Look, we can debate the proper and private way to do Captchas all day, but if we remove the existing implementation we will be plunged into a world of hurt. I run tucson.social - a tiny instance with barely any users and I find myself really ticked off at other Admin’s abdication of duty when it comes to engaging with the developers. For all the Fediverse discussion on this, where are the github issue comments? Where is our attempt to convince the devs in this. No, seriously WHERE ARE THEY? Oh, you think that just because an “Issue” exists to bring back Captchas is the best you can do? NO it is not the best we can do, we need to be applying some pressure to the developers here and that requires EVERYONE to do their part. The Devs can’t make Lemmy an awesome place for us if us admins refuse to meaningfully engage with the project and provide feedback on crucial things like this. So are you an admin? If so, we need more comments here: https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy/issues/3200 [https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy/issues/3200] We need to make it VERY clear that Captcha is required before v0.18’s release. Not after when we’ll all be scrambling… EDIT: To be clear I’m talking to all instance admins, not just Beehaw’s.

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/387482

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ca/post/805172

Big Drama Llamas...

User @th3raid0r@tucson.social posted a call to pressure the devs to return CAPTCHA support before v.0.18 arrives on the community !technology@beehaw.org.

Mixed response from users and beehaw admins.

Lemmy issue #2922 is where it was removed 2 weeks ago due to its effectiveness being limited, Lemmy issue #3200 is the issue where it is suggested to have it return. Repo maintainers are somewhat perceptive to reverting it but would be more willing to accept a full implementation of graphical CAPTCHA over the previous version.

Alternative links: https://lemmy.ca/post/793011, https://beehaw.org/post/667199. (Note that if you view from a defed instance with Beehaw you will only see a handful of comments).

Discussion welcome here.