•

Major Critics Of Gaza War Say Trump Will ‘Accelerate The Killing’

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/gaza-war-harris-trump_n_66eb9ed6e4b00b7ce259a657

In a careful Thursday statement, the “Uncommitted” movement decried the Republican presidential nominee and third parties who could help him win while expressing frustration with Democrats.

Major Critics Of Gaza War Say Trump Will ‘Accelerate The Killing’

The “Uncommitted” movement seeking a change in the Democratic Party’s approach to the war in Gaza on Thursday announced it is not ready to support Democratic presidential nominee Kamala Harris — while urging voters not to back Republican nominee Donald Trump or third-party candidates who could help Trump win the November election.

The “Uncommitted” group “opposes a Donald Trump presidency, whose agenda includes plans to accelerate the killing in Gaza while intensifying the suppression of anti-war organizing,” the statement continues. Additionally, the group is “not recommending a third-party vote in the Presidential election, especially as third party votes in key swing states could help inadvertently deliver a Trump presidency given our country’s broken electoral college system.”

31 comments

harrys_balzac

•

"Well, let's cross our fingers and hope the Democrats can get out the vote despite our virtue signalling."

This announcement is just pointless.

jhymesba

•

At least we're not getting the 'vote third party' spiel. I'll never hold a person's opinions on the Dems against them. I just don't want anything done or suggested that will help Trump and his merry band of assholes.

sxan

•

Well, duh. Anyone who didn't know this hasn't been paying attention. He's (Trump) said as much, himself.

jhymesba

•

I can get behind this. Sure, we can criticise Team Blue for slow-dragging their feet on protecting Palestinians. Never said we couldn't. That said, there's clear consequences to a Trump victory. The Uncommitted have made it clear they grasp this and ask you to vote for Harris, even if they can't endorse Harris. Staying home, voting third party, or heaven forbid, voting Trump will just make things in the Middle East FAR worse.

gravitas_deficiency

•

For real, that’s all I’ve been saying whenever people start come in and start bashing on Harris and pushing false equivalence. Like, yeah, Biden is super bad on his policy towards Israel and Gaza; I HOPE Harris will be better; I KNOW Trump will be worse.

That’s it. That’s the whole dynamic. That’s the only two choices we have as members of the American electorate.

UnderpantsWeevil

•

bashing on Harris and pushing false equivalence

You claim the Ds and Rs are the same, but you can very clearly see that the Ds are in favor of 10% less infanticide.

That’s the only two choices we have

The genocidiers have us by the balls, folks. Nothing you can do but voice your full throated support for one of them.

holycrap

•

The path to ending the conflict is through boycotts, not the president. But that takes time, so 10% less killing makes sense as a stop gap.

There is precedent for this. See apartheid South Africa. Palestinian freedom will seem impossible until it becomes inevitable.

UnderpantsWeevil

•

The path to ending the conflict is through boycotts, not the president.

US House overwhelmingly passes anti-BDS resolution

We've already seen individual states go so far as to issue state sanctions aimed at BDS movements. US House Resolution 246 seems to be an exercise in vote counting by the AIPAC Lobby to advance a national bill to the same effect.

Palestinian freedom will seem impossible until it becomes inevitable.

The South African Apartheid system likely would have held up indefinitely if the US was the only country involved deciding its fate. And the Afrikaners had far less influence over the US Congress than the Israel lobby.

SulaymanF

•

So you’re saying I should still vote for infanticide? I don’t want that kind of blood on my hands. That’s the issue in the Trolley Problem.

Asafum

•

Not voting is just allowing the worse option which still puts blood on your hands. Inaction still has consequences.

We don't live in a world where we have the ability to be completely pure, it's an option that simply doesn't exist unfortunately. :(

UnderpantsWeevil

•

I don’t want that kind of blood on my hands.

The joke of the modern American electoral system is that all the "viable" candidates are bloody. And if you abstain from voting or vote third party, you're accused of supporting the winning candidate, regardless of your personal politics.

That is, I think, a big part of what drives the street protests. Americans who don't want to be complicit in this barbarity have no other actionable way to express their condemnation.

gravitas_deficiency

•

Don’t put words in my mouth. You are a part of the problem that I’m highlighting.

vzq

•

“Voting is just a way to pick the person that will be sitting across from me at the negotiation table next year”, is one of the ways to think about it.

Harris‘ policy on Israel is ambiguous, weak and too-little-too-late. But you’ll get further trying to influence her administration than Trump 2.0.

Eldritch

•

The ambiguity is ironically a good sign. That she isn't outright committed to the status quo. But rather not willing to signal her actual position. If she came out strongly against Israel and for Palestine. Unfortunately that would be a large hindrance to her candidacy in the current climate.

It's a shame that those illegally occupying Palestine have such influence over our government. Especially after their terrorist attacks of the last few days. Not to mention the decades long slow genocide that's only accelerated in the last year.

Ensign_Crab

•

Sure, we can criticise Team Blue for slow-dragging their feet on protecting Palestinians.

HA.

OccamsTeapot

•

Sure, we can criticise Team Blue for slow-dragging their feet on protecting Palestinians.

Incredibly generous way to put it. They are providing the weapons that maim and kill the innocent children. I criticise them for the blood on their hands

givesomefucks

•

Biden isn't dragging his feet...

He's moving at light ing speed (for his age) to support Israel's genocide in anyway he can, including going around congress illegally to avoid a delay of just a few days.

I just hate how all the blame is put on voters, it's literally Kamala and her campaign teams job to get votes, and despite how much they hate the thought, that means giving Dem voters what Dem voters want.

And they don't want to be citizens of pretty much the only country still supporting the genocide by sending munitions. Especially when it's a violation of the ~~Legacy~~ Lehey law and bare minimum we should be demanding Israel track the use of US supplied munitions.

Like. You're completely underselling the damage Biden and other party leaders are causing...

And then claiming you can't understand why people don't like him or the party's stance.

Why dont you spend your time and effort trying to stop a genocide instead of telling people they have to support a genocide?

Your way even if we win. Still a genocide.

If we demand Kamala and party leadership stop breaking US and international law, and they actually listen

Kamala could moonwalk into the oval office and Israel wouldn't be able to continue their genocide.

What's so hard about picking the best path?

We can stop trump and genocide or just stop trump.

Seems like an easy choice to me

makyo

•

I mean if I understand you correctly you're saying bascially the same thing as OP - can hold Biden/Harris feet to the fire while working to re-elect Kamala and defeat Trump.

jhymesba

•

And the fun part is these aren't my words. These are the words of the "Uncommitted" faction that wants to hold Democrats' feet to the fire. They're saying that at the moment, there's bigger fish to fry -- a MAGAt movement that would make everything Team Blue has done look like child's play in comparison. So, Mr. Give Some Fucks isn't just arguing with me. He's arguing with the guys and gals actually advocating for Palestinians.

WhiskyTangoFoxtrot

•

Do you honestly think they give a fuck?

jhymesba

•

Sorry, can't answer that question. I'll be Rule 3'd if I did. :3

vzq

•

It’s good to get that out explicitly, because it has been the focus of a lot of misinformation out there.

The cause of Palestinians is not served by a second Trump presidency. Preventing it should be a major aim of any pro-Palestinian advocate.

jhymesba

•

That it's the advocacy group trying to hold Biden and Harris accountable for the continuation of the atrocities in Palestine saying this should make it clear. The actual people on the ground may feel strongly about Palestinian civil rights, they know where their bread is buttered and that the other realistic alternative in this election is "Orange Hitler", to use another poster's euphemism, is just plain horrible.

freshcow

•

I think everyone who is being intellectually honest knows full well that Trump would be worse. The problem seems to be that the Democratic party has decided it can take the votes of the left wing of its party for granted. If the left is not willing to actually follow through and withhold their votes, then the Democrats know that they never have to appease them. It's really a lose-lose situation until the Harris campaign shows some moral courage or takes seriously the possibility of losing votes over this issue.

SulaymanF

•

Exactly. We know how bad Trump is, but Biden in his disastrous “hug Netanyahu” policy went out of his way to not just ignore pro-Palestinian voices but actively insult them. He said “I have zero trust of Palestinians” and publicly supported the invasion of Al Shifa hospital despite the ridiculous and debunked claim that there was a 3 story underground Hamas base beneath it. He overrode his advisors and removed pro-Palestine language in all his October and November speeches. He met with Israeli victims but never met a single Palestinian one and even had his tour bus detour around towns in Michigan that had too many Arab-Americans. He claimed he was looking for peace but vetoed ceasefire attempts and bashed Palestinians in general. (He later privately told people he meant to bash Hamas and shouldn’t have use the words interchangeably, but never apologized).

It’s one thing to hold your nose and vote for Biden, but it’s quite another to vote for him when he’s so unapologetically anti-Palestinian. And his attempt to get Arab-Americans to vote for him when he helped kill their relatives is to ignore them and say “Trump would be worse.” That’s not a winning strategy and he wants to claim he both needs our votes to win but also that we aren’t politically relevant.

I hope Biden retires in shame and that Harris does better. She already had been meeting with Palestinian-American families when Biden refused to be seen with one.

reddit_sux

•

People who are uncommitted because of Gaza are fools to think that their reticence won't have any consequences in the country.

Having said that there is no hope for Gazans from US since both the parties are bought and paid for by the Israelis.

Russia take note - US only lets those foreign countries to influence the election who are willing to buy both the parties.

SulaymanF

•

Nobody is claiming that and you’re attacking a strawman.

The problem is we don’t want to reward politicians for their bad behavior “because Trump is worse” or get blood on our own hands by voting for someone who will continue the same deadly failed policies. Have you ever heard of the Trolley Problem? It’s not as straightforward as you think.

UnderpantsWeevil

•

UN votes against Israel’s occupation of Palestine: Will it change anything?

Seems like the rest of the international community is moving on this whether or not the US leadership approves of it.

Barking up the "Who will you vote for?" tree, when neither American candidate for President has expressed an interest in ending the holocaust in Gaza or prosecuting the litany of war crimes in surrounding Lebanon, Egypt, and Jordan, seems pointless.

If anything "Vote for Kamala because hey remember that genocide we're financing via Israel?" seems like its going to scare away more voters than it attracts.

Empricorn

•

What, just because he basically said he would and loves dictators?

OccamsTeapot

•

Unsurprising. While people opposed to any criticism of the democrats' self defeating and inhumane policy on this issue like to pretend it's all a pro Trump psy op, it's actually more of a DON'T SUPPORT GENOCIDE YOU EVIL FUCKS type of thing.

But for the dems it's fine because the electoral college has the whole country by the balls I guess ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ who are you going to vote for dumb dumb? Orange hitler? Spoiler candidates? Lol didn't think so, send the bombs boyos

MediaBiasFactChecker

•

::: spoiler Huffington Post - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report) Information for Huffington Post:

MBFC: Left - Credibility: Medium - Factual Reporting: Mixed - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source
:::

::: spoiler Search topics on Ground.News https://www.huffpost.com/entry/gaza-war-harris-trump_n_66eb9ed6e4b00b7ce259a657 ::: Media Bias Fact Check | bot support