It says the axis are sorted by frequency, so probably the prefix "twat" was too rare to show up on the chart.
Can you make an API to randomize it for my email sign off for work? Getting real tired of lying that I have any regards, or that they are kind.
...In short, that meeting could have been this email, and this email could have been an IM.
Cruel disregards <CumClowns>,
YT
Some of the near zero but not zero combinations don't make a lot of sense to not just be zero.
Like dumbbag, scumhat, dipclown... I don't know about you, but those ones colored as "thousands of uses" doesn't seem right to me. Unless it was open so far as to search for those words used back to back and not specifically attached in any way as implied.
But yeah, there are so many combinations that seem way too far into the orange to make sense to me. I'm curious to see the actual numbers the graph was built with.
The internet is vast and if this is to be believed, sourced over more than a decade. Not that unbelievable, imho.
I'm definitely gonna write some of these down and try to work them in. But some of them have earned their 0 uses so far.
I'm a bit concerned about shitshit being so popular, despite never hearing it. Am I out of touch, or are the children wrong?
As an out of touch person, I have a possible explanation for this: have you ever said "shit" repeatedly as something goes wrong? I imagine some people would write a story where that happens and write it as "shitshitshit" and not "shit shit shit". But outside of that situation I have never seen or heard "shitshit".
Missing knife on the columns distorted the graph. Poopknife would be on the top with it.
Even though it’s the most appallingly milquetoast swear ever, the lack of “cockwomble” invalidates this chart.