https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/crrlnl2vqe2o
US presidential candidates Kamala Harris and Donald Trump would also be shown the plan, President Zelensky says.
Mr. Zelenskyy, please show a different set of plans to Trump. He is a traitor to the US democracy, to its government, to its people, and countries in NATO.
for disinformation. if he shows a different plan to trump, it will end up in russia and cause confusion
"It may sound too ambitious for some, but it is an important plan for us," he added, saying that he would also show the plan to both US presidential candidates Kamala Harris and Donald Trump.
This doesn't answer my question.
In the current situation, Trump has no influence on decision-making in regard to Ukraine. Until he is possibly elected president, he is just an unnecessary security risk.
Because Trump would spill the plan to Putin. He's already handed over documents regarding the US agents working in and around Russia, several of who "mysteriously" got caught not long after. He's definitely a security risk.
This just shows how Trump completely destroyed normal politics. It does make sense for a country in Ukraines situation to talk to both parties and to get both parties on board. Then the plan could move along regardless of who wins the election in Nov. This would have been possible in the past, with George W. Bush, Obama, Clinton & all other presidents and was actually done for other conflicts and topics in the past. Trump... is special.
Well to answer your question, because kamala and trump could be the next US president so he doesn't have to present it again. Should he? For several reasons, no.
To hedge his bets. He can't let the future of Ukraine be entirely decided by a US election that's out of his control.
Yanks secretly want a monarchy thats why the still refer to people no longer in office by their title. Trump could get security briefings but it is apparently not happening at the moment.
33% do. The rest of us just want the government to do it's job and protect us from foreign adversaries, corporations who want to poison us, and billionaires who want to go back to the feudal age.
Unfortunately that 33% has way more pull thanks to the outdated electoral college and are unfathomably stupid thanks to lead pipes and Republicans actively sabotaging the educational system.
Is this like the time my mom said "Grandpa doesn't have much time to live. LOL" because she thought it stood for "Lots Of Love"?
Don't worry, they'll dumb it down so Trump can fit it in his tiny little mind, I'm sure, so the end leak of intelligence to Putin will be: "Ukraine says they're going to BIGLY WIN! WOW! Very few people know that!"
"You give me big go booms. I go boom the bad guys you hate. Major winning happens. You take all credit. 'Very smart and brave of Trump to give Ukraine all those go booms.' Everyone says so"
I go boom the bad guys you hate.
But that precludes using the booms on Russians, whose jackboots Trump adores.
That's why Zelensky must, under no circumstances, go into any kind of specifics with Trump. Just make it about how great and cool it will make Trump look
Trump: "Which bad guys??"
Ukrainian ambassador, having recently learning the Dumbass dialect of American English: "The BIGGEST bad guys! The ones you hate more than anything! And you won't even have to worry about them, because we'll do it real quiet and secret!"
Trump: "WOW"
I hope they can hit and cripple iskander production… that will alleviate some of the pain.
::: spoiler BBC News - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report) Information for BBC News:
MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United Kingdom
Wikipedia about this source
:::
::: spoiler Search topics on Ground.News https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/crrlnl2vqe2o ::: Media Bias Fact Check | bot support
I hope it works but honestly I don’t see any path for Ukraine to recover all of its territory at this point. Barring some major shakeup that causes Russian resistance to collapse.
The invasion of Russia has given them at least small gains for the first time in a while but it really doesn’t change the overall situation as of right now. The territory gained is very small compared to what they’ve lost.
Russia would have just continue letting them gain more and more territory until they have enough for some kind of exchange, but that seems unlikely. They were caught off guard, but now that they’re defending, further advances will become difficult and it’s likely to soon reach another stalemate like the other fronts.
You do realize they took over a good chunk of russia in less than a week right? With the aid package and kamala having a really good chance at winning, ukraine is sitting pretty good.
A tiny area of strategically insignificant territory.
Look at the size of the territory gained compared with what they’ve lost: https://images.jifo.co/21540781_1723737029035.svg
It’s an interesting gambit but like I said in my initial comment, the Russian resistance would need to essentially collapse for them to gain enough territory to make some kind of exchange for what they’ve lost. Unless they continue to gain ground at the same rate for the next year I don’t see this changing the overall situation which has been near stalemate on the main front for over a year now.
I don’t see Kamala’s policy being meaningfully different from Biden and it’s far from sure she wins. Trump will almost certainly cut aid and make the situation substantially worse.
