https://www.nytimes.com/2024/08/02/us/texas-voting-rights-minorities.html?unlocked_article_code=1._00.Ildd.fBTWdRZJwTj-
Reversing decades of precedent, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ruled in a Texas case that different minority groups cannot jointly claim that their votes have been diluted.
This court is a Republican-majority appeals court
The case involved districts for county commissioners in Galveston County, Texas, a community of about 350,000 people, where the last round of redistricting redrew a district in which Black and Hispanic voters together made up a majority of voters. The redrawn boundaries reduced their combined share of the district’s electorate to 38 percent, and a lawsuit claimed that doing so violated Section Two of the Voting Rights Act, which prohibits drawing maps that dilute minority voting power.
A lower court and the three-judge appellate panel both ruled that the new map was a clear violation of the law.
"Yeah, they broke the law by gerry-mandering your district in order to dilute your voting power..."
But the full Fifth Circuit disagreed, saying that the law does not explicitly allow voters from more than one minority group to “combine forces” to claim their votes were diluted.
"...but you both complained about it at the same time and we've decided that means we can ignore you because magic legal words that totally aren't racist."
The 12 judges in the majority were all appointed by Republican presidents.
Curb Your Enthusiasm music begins
Man, if it doesn't explicitly disallow it either, how is that ruling valid at all? This shit doesn't make sense.
Does this mean that if you discriminate minorities as a groups, there's no recourse? They probably can point to how the figures as they have, and they can't submit a joint case.
The 12 judges in the majority were all appointed by Republican presidents. Five of the six dissenters were named by Democratic presidents.
Of course
If we manage to take back the House, we need to pull all funding from the 5th Circuit.
Be better to increase its size; there are constitutional restrictions on cutting the pay of judges.
Oh, I didn't mean cutting their pay. I meant starving the whole circuit of operating funds. Keep paying the judges if we have to but nothing is getting done if the courthouse is closed.
but since voting is a sham and the courts are run by kangaroos nothing short of a riot is going change anything
Voting is most definitely not a sham; there are real issues with gerrymandering, but the reality is that power is in fact awarded in the US on the basis of who wins elections.
The latest round of redistricting in Galveston County, a community of 350,000 people, redrew a district in which Black and Hispanic voters together had made up a majority of voters. The redrawn boundaries reduced their combined share of the district’s electorate to 38 percent.
right there in the article
leaders rigged the election to get elected and to keep holding power
voting is a sham
and both parties participate in different ways to keep people from voting
That's called gerymandering.
And yes, unilateral disarmament is a dumb idea — the Democrats ended gerrymandering in a few states (eg: California) but aren't going to end it nationally except as part of a law to do it for the whole country. Which the Republicans have blocked at the federal level.
just to both party this
Democrats and Republicans both are for funding police and making new laws and legislations for the citizens to be arrested on restricting access and rights to voting
when has either party pushed for more education funding which again restricts the citizens from voting by taking away choices or for universal healthcare
all related to voting access and rights
an population that is impoverished, malnourished, uneducated, sick, trampled on by the authorities are way easier to control when it comes to elections
Removed for misinformation. Democrats are absolutely not in the business of restricting voting access. That is solely a Republican issue.
however anyone wants to spin it Democrats do it too just not openly or with the same tactics
::: spoiler New York Times Media Bias Fact Check Credibility: [High] (Click to view Full Report)
Name: New York Times Bias: Left-Center
Factual Reporting: High
Country: United States of America
Full Report: https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/new-york-times/
Check the bias and credibility of this article on Ground.News
:::
Thanks to Media Bias Fact Check for their access to the API.
Please consider supporting them by donating.
::: spoiler Footer
Beep boop. This action was performed automatically. If you dont like me then please block me.💔
If you have any questions or comments about me, you can make a post to LW Support lemmy community.
:::