It's either the total destruction of all the worlds forests, OR I take a huge financial hit with my unimaginably terrible investment into leaves as currency.
As you can see, by this logic it is ... um ... better for the economy ... that we destroy all the world's forests.
"Sir, we must burn down the world's forests and destroy everyone's economic assets."
"Are you sure that this is the way to go about solving inflation?"
"Inflation?"
Someone shittily draw a Lemmy leaf in MS paint so we can all award it to the leafiest of comments
Ya know, it probably would be a lot easier to sanitize all the telephones if it’s just basic dirt from leaves and not trace cocaine everywhere
I mean, if gold is massively devalued. Don't think it'd ever be worth less than leaves, but given its actual useful properties (as opposed to its arbitrary use as a currency) gold's value should be a lot lower than it is.
Imagine brushing all these gold leaves onto a pile, then with a shovel disposing of those leaves.
If you want an actual answer, it's not the leaves that go in but the sap inside the tree, and it's a 40 to 1 ratio of sap to syrup.
A bottle will need about 30 litres (8 gallons) of sap.
