Yeah, maybe I'm the one getting wooshed here, but that seems like the perfect picture for this article. Seems intentional and entirely appropriate.
I'm getting a kick out of this hypothetical person responsible for correcting AI mistakes looking at AI image gen with deformed hands and saying "looks fine to me, totally normal."
No sorry, I didn't mean the image was AI generated. I interpreted the person in the image as being the employee correcting AI mistakes, but because of their hands they don't correct any of the deformed hands in other AI image gen.
Looks intentional. I don't think it's even AI generated, but there's too few pixels to tell for sure.
Hahaha, spend millions or billions to train ai, use natural resources to power it all, then resort to humans fixing the shit that is AI 😂
The secret of AI is that it’s really exploited humans all the way down.
The unpaid people who produce the training data, the underpaid people who categorize it, the underpaid people who rate the model’s responses, and the underpaid (and t r a u m a t i z e d) people who review flagged user interactions.
Why are the results for Weird Al needing changes? Did he do a new Star Wars song, or polka medley?
Kind of gives me flashbacks to Amazon go stores. Despite them discussing all of their advanced technology to allow you to simply walk out with your groceries, around 70% had to be manually reviewed and corrected by an army of Indian technicians. I have a feeling this is going to be another case of ai meaning "A bunch of Indians"
I think it would be better served as a button/cliclable on individual search results as a sort of "summarize this page" and interactive Q&A based off of that individual entry. As it stands right now, it pulls too much garbage from all the combined results.