I've definitely seen some emotional mods on Lemmy who relish in throwing gas at the fire before a ban and posts from people complaining about them. Hell, I have experienced it first hand. And it doesn't look like anything is ever done about abuse. The sad thing is that Lemmy can change this but doesn't look like it wants to.
"Post removed. Reason: Rule 1" No other explanation given and nobody oversees the moderation. The standard is on the floor. I'd be more than happy to volunteer if there was a auditing system in place. We to police the police, per se, and do so in a fair and transparent way.
It's human nature .... and it's also politics and marketing
In the non political communities, the people with the most time take the opportunity to moderate. Unfortunately having time on your hands is not an indicator of wealth, ability or status. A percentage of these people are just internet addicted individuals that spend all their lives online. And a percentage of these people see moderating as way to give them power over others.
The other dynamic I see happening is politics and marketing and propaganda. In the political communities, important messages need to be pushed by state organizations or groups to push a message or react to opposing views. We like to think that we are a tiny independent bubble in Lemmy but the more popular it becomes, the more professional and dedicated marketers will migrate into the service.
It's all human nature .... the human nature to be in control, to have control or to exert control.
And like you say, the only way to moderate it all is to moderate ourselves and others on a continual basis.
“The price of freedom is eternal vigilance.” -Thomas Jefferson
We will never achieve a free form social media that can be open, inclusive and safe for everyone ... we have to realise that we have to always be fighting and advocating for one, otherwise we will always run the risk of giving room to those who want control over everyone and everything.
This is absolute bullshit.
I used to be a mod on /r/soccer, and there were strict rules around duplicates, and on keeping things related to football news and OC. It's the most popular sport in the world, and when you've got enough subscribers to fill multiple stadiums, just "posting anything football" doesn't scale. You also end up with a huge amount of content about the most popular teams, and when there's a long-tail of fans from other leagues/countries you isolate a lot of people.
I can happily say that in the time I was a mod there were no questionable decisions. The mods went out of their way to verify decisions, discuss them with others, and reverse any bans if the user acknowledged that they'd broken rules. What the mods got in return was:
Funny enough, pretty much every decision was made by reports. Four reports triggered a message in modmail, and we just followed what users had reported..
Yeah your experience matches mine. Id really encourage people to not blanket trash on all mods. It is a lot of work that goes into moderating communities and it is either done by people who love the community, or by someone who loves that power dynamic. I'm not saying all mods are perfect, but give a chance for individual mods to prove themselves. It's generally a thankless job, especially lately. By trashing on all mods we're just going to scare away the good intentioned people and all that is left are the power hungry ones.
Everything is done via modmail. Users report posts/comments, and the reports go into a queue that basically says "this comment has been reported due to X". As a mod, you go into the queue, review the content, and decide what to do. Very occasionally, you'd look at the new posts, but very few people did this, because reports would usually come into modmail within minutes. In terms of "power", all that was different from being a normal user was some extra buttons, and modmail.
Often we'd be called out for banning people, or deleting things. This was almost always the admins, because I assume people had broken rules that had incurred their wrath, or they had been caught with duplicate/spam profiles to get around bans. We got a lot of shit for one ban...which was the kid that got in trouble with the police for stalking a mod at their place of work.
There were about 15 of us, and we were told to basically do as much or as little as possible. All the rules were community driven, so users got a say in what rules to add (don't accept this source, no compilations, no news from years ago to confuse people, etc).
Sadly, with such a popular sub, a post that clearly breaks rules might get 300-500 upvotes before it's removed, and you get the typical "but everyone likes this post, why remove it?!". In my experience, users don't care if it breaks the rules, until they care it breaks the rules. There is no winning when you're a mod.
I did it because I used the sub for a decade, and wanted to give back while.i had been laid-off from work (COVID times). I definitely don't regret it, and if Reddit weren't so shit I'd do it again.
Since Lemmy is federated, anyone can start their own instance so it's easy for users to migrate if the admins on one instance decide to start banning everyone they don't like.
Yes and no, more group think, but you're also much freer to start your own comm and moderate it better.
Reddit never assigned mods until the exodus. Almost all communities had people who created them as the mods.
Pretty much the only subs that had mods that got them assigned where the main default ones, but that was at the beginning and pretty much all those big sub mods just wanted the power and literally would do anything they could to get in with other big subs as mods even if they didn't contribute.
Sorry but I'm on the mod's side here. Some content doesn't belong on some communities. Most people upvote from their front page without even checking what community you posted to. If you allow things based on popularity, every community devolves into deep-fried shitposts
These were the complaints I heard about mods before the API debacle. After all the mods quit or got their 3rd party tools nuked, it was all complaints about repost bots not being removed. I've never been a mod, but you couldn't pay me enough to babysit thousands of angry dorks, much less get me to do it for free.
Proudly perma-banned from Reddit for taking the piss out of the far right.
Proudly had comments deleted from lemmy.ml for taking the piss out of the far left.
Perfectly balanced, as all things should be.
Getting banned from Lemmy.ml is like shooting fish in a barrel though. They're very sensitive.
Please don't call them "the far left". They're just pretending, in reality they're authoritarians defending Russia, China and Iran, while shitting on the West at every opportunity.
Alt left covers way too many factions of people that it could apply to. You have disaffected liberals, anti-woke progressives, left-lib Joe Rogan types, tankies and MAGA communists. MAGAcoms are just tankies who vote for populist Republicans because Bolsheviks and Republicans happen to align on many/social cultural issues and support using the state to crack down on what they consider moral depravity.
The rules end up there because people complain about things and then the mods implement a rule to ban the things people complain about. Sometimes they let the community vote on it. It does end up being the vocal minority who the rules cater to sometimes.
And they have to be more or less vague to give the moderators room to decide if the rule breaker did it by accident or is just an asshole. Trolls will do anything to walk the fine line between not breaking the rules and being as annoying as possible.
I mean…there’s very good reasons to respect the wishes of minority groups sometimes (not always). It’s the reason they wrote the “First they came for the communists” poem.
the admins let people like akwardtheturtle have free rein over hundreds thousands of subs until they protested the API stuff
Awhile back yeah. I saw a post on reddit back then of their post-ban discord meltdown... it was exactly what you'd expect
I feel like this problem is just part of the reddit/Lemmy model. 15 or 20 years ago, on an internet with different forums under different domain names on different hosts owned by independent admins, no one would ever be mod of 1000 different forums.
The problem is now that people don't want to go to obscure forums or take the time to register accounts on dozens of websites. Everyone wants to be part of huge social media silos. Things like Oauth account creation might make that easier when users can do things like "sign in with Google." Federation through sites like Lemmy could make things better since one account can access every other instance, but I don't see normies ever adopting federated platforms unless each platform has an instance that becomes "The" instance where normies can enter "Lemmy" or "Mastodon" into Google and have that instance be the first result.
The world elites have a huge interest in keeping people in centralized silos because it makes it much easier to control the population when they're gathered around only a few websites.
Nah, upvoters are stupid and will often upvote anything with a pretty picture regardless of whether it fits a sub, regardless of whether it's been reposted 50 trillion times, and regardless of whether it's complete bullshit. Mods absolutely should delete a lot of posts even if they're popular.
My number 1 desire for a reddit replacement is some sort of meta restrictions on voting. Ban people from voting for a post if they're not subbed. Ban people who upvote bad content from voting in your sub. The more and more time I spend on reddit and the fediverse, the more I'm convinced that upvotes as implemented are a broken, shitty way to determine what content I see.
Sorry bro, the cropping here is very bad, I can't see what it says :(
You should probably do a better job of cropping your memes bro
Welcome to Lemmy Here from a permanent ban last year for .... Fuck I don't even know just pissed off the wrong mod
That r*ddit mod or admin is looking a little skinny. Did they do the impossible and actually stand up and walk away from their computer?
Now that you mention it, he is pretty skinny for a reddit mod. A bit too handsome as well. Hmmmmm
Somebody posted a picture of a Harry Potter book burning in what I believe was a bird bath.
I commented that it was ironic that two groups so diametrically opposed as those that don't like shitty TERFs, and crazy Fundamentalists that not only believe magic is real, but also Sinful, would protest the books in that way for such completely different reasons.
The person posting said something about "hurr durr mah both sides," some people corrected them that I wasn't saying they were the same, just that it was bizarre that they agree on something at all, much less that... and then the mod removed my comment (I believe the same that wrote the comment responding to mine).
So... sometimes mods here can show poor reading comprehension and remove things for no reason as well.
I get posts removed now and again. Just arbitrarily. The big subs are not too bad, but smaller ones are often vanity projects.
Probably because that's an incendiary pseudo-argument often used by bigots to deny someone's gender identity.
It's reality. Men who want to be like women, and vice versa, are finding out the hard way.
I'd rather be called a bigot than denying reality to satisfy the desires of fetishists online and the medical industry.
Imo, the biggest tragedy are all the kids that get groomed into undergoing "treatment" for gender dysphoria. Like puberty blockers and even surgery.
You are being a bigot BY denying the parts of reality that don't fit your narrow and factually inaccurate worldview.
You are accusing me of being biased, meanwhile these articles are extremely biased.
I already elaborated on this in previous posts, but the gist of it is that you cannot build a society with all its various systems without having a practical conceptualization of what humans are. This is why your idea of gender-nonbinary, which is impractical to accept wholesale, will never go beyond the bedroom, niche parts of the medical industry, and maybe some transtoilets here and there. 99% of the world will still run based on the concept of two sexes, because it aligns better with reality, because it's what's practical.
In times of prosperity, you can afford to play around with these ideologies (at the expense of some boys and girls), but once that prosperity ends due to war or similarly unfortunate events, all these ideas go out the window!
You are accusing me of being biased, meanwhile these articles are extremely biased.
A bias in favor of scientifically accurate reality isn't a bad thing. Bigotry is.
the gist of it is that you cannot build a society with all its various systems without having a practical conceptualization of what humans are. This is why your idea of gender-nonbinary, which is impractical to accept wholesale, will never go beyond the bedroom, niche parts of the medical industry, and maybe some transtoilets here and there. 99% of the world will still run based on the concept of two sexes, because it aligns better with reality, because it's what's practical.
Absolute nonsense from start to finish.
Just because you're used to things working a certain way doesn't mean that it has to be that way. Similar arguments have been used against things like abolishing slavery, women entering the workforce and the concept of secular education.
Turns out that those things ENRICH society rather than break it. Just like allowing people the gender identity that feels natural to them and respecting that reality.
In times of prosperity, you can afford to play around with these ideologies (at the expense of some boys and girls), but once that prosperity ends due to war or similarly unfortunate events, all these ideas go out the window!
Again, same old "society can only work if we don't change it to be more open towards people different from me" bigoted bullshit that has been spouted since marginalized people first started getting any rights.
Just because you’re used to things working a certain way doesn’t mean that it has to be that way.
True.
Similar arguments have been used against things like abolishing slavery, women entering the workforce and the concept of secular education.
Slavery as it existed in the 1700s wasn't abolished because the rulers had an epiphany and realized the errors of their ways. It was (mostly, not entirely) abolished for practical reasons. Institutionalized slavery still exists. You have prison labor in countries like the US. We also see outsourced slavery to more degenerate countries like China, where they do have actual slaves or laborers who are slaves in every way but name. Have you ever heard of slave free cotton, or slave free cocoa? These words exist because slavery is not gone. Companies and us consumers around the world are indirectly benefiting from slave labor till this day. I have to look long and hard to find stuff that are more ethically produced, you should know that it's hard. We also see sex slavery, which intersects with the porn industry. Some of the women in porn could be trafficking victims. I wonder if liberals who goon to porn understand that.
Women working corporate jobs has brought a lot of economical advantages, no doubt. They pay taxes, they increase productivity, they saturate the job market, etc. But it came at the expense of the family unit, and birth-rates. You have a rising percentage of older people needing care, and a less percentage of younger people to care for and replace them. This is one reason why many western countries are inviting immigrants, to keep things sustainable. But for how long?
Women working is not a new phenomena. Child-rearing, taking care of the husband, taking care of the home, and doing everything a housewife does is a full-time job. It's an honorable job. You seem to have no issue with a woman being obedient to a boss in a corporation, and keeping a smile at all times lest she gets fired. But if it's her husband that she obeys, you suddenly get your panties in a twist.
Just like allowing people the gender identity that feels natural to them and respecting that reality.
It's so natural in fact, that we have an unprecedented number of "trans-youths". I wonder why. Maybe previous generations were just too scared to get out of the closet. Or maybe, it is because young boys and girls are being indoctrinated.
Again, same old “society can only work if we don’t change it to be more open towards people different from me” bigoted bullshit that has been spouted since marginalized people first started getting any rights.
Go and tell that to Ukraine.
i remember posting in /r/boneappletea a screenshot where a well known brand made a mistake, they deleted it because it was against a rule saying there should be no identifying informations, like people could raid poor multi million brand or something, also the sub was notorious for posting speech to text errors without batting an eye
on the other hand i've been banned on lemmy twice, fist first time was because my rather sexist comment, but second time was because i said something about Uighurs genocide in China, (guess what instance was that?) also both bans were issued without any warning, completely against their CoC
lol, I'm not arguing about that one, it was a bad comment and i regret it, the ban was well deserved, but i'd rather get a warn first, in accordance with their CoC
still not getting what typo i made, i might've forgotten some 'the's or 'a's, cause English isn't my first language
Well, that's not even shocking, honestly, because the mods on reddit are garbage, and they migrated here, still garbage, because spez took their precious tools away, which forced them into actually doing their jobs.
Mods should never use their privileges in discussions where they are involved (obviously they should not be the only mod on a channel either).
I have been on both sides, mod and victim of mod abuse. Mistakes happen. It is a delicate balance on both sides of keeping constructive and not trying to „be right“ by any means.
The most absurd situation is when you have to block a mod because they’re actually the head troll and also an admin of an instance. Its both hilarious and sad.
I think a hardcoded function to file complaints against mods with the other mods and/or the admins and optionally, a way to elect mods and unelect them would be great.
In fact I might try to make it. :)
Erego, fuck the majority of reddit mods. I was a redditor for nearly 12 years, and in that span of time? I met a shockingly few amount of decent mods. "Mistakes happen"? I don't quite think that cuts it. In my experience it was never once a mistake. Off the top of my head: got banned from /r/gamestop for defending children with autism and their parents, /r/justiceserved simply because I had the audacity to comment in /r/JoeRogan when they didn't even know what I said, /r/gamingcirclejerk because I enjoyed my time with hogwarts legacy, /r/Destinythegame because I defended myself from an elitist dogpile because I said I wanted matchmaking, /r/parenting because I gave parenting advice and /r/SteamDeck because I pointed out that the rules said no low effort posts, yet the sub was full of them and upvoted while actual effort posts, like tech support, were downvoted and ignored. Then the mods went a step further, and mass reported me for harassment because I presented mountains of evidence I gathered, showing they don't properly do their jobs, which then got me completely banned from reddit. I've seen significantly more than that. These are just the ones I can easily remember the details of. I find very hard to believe you, a mod, were a victim of mod abuse. Statistically, you could easily be mistaken for another terrible mod. Obviously I don't know much about you, it just seems very unlikely. No offense. Genuinely.
Well. There is a boatload to unpack here but I dont have that much time so let me try to make it brief:
By „Mistakes happen“ I meant that I can see that people can make mistakes, even as mods, but they need to own up to them, which they rarely do.
As a general rule, I believe that you have experienced this and are telling the truth about your experience because that is your reality and in stark opposition to you, I dont accuse others of being not genuine.
What I do see is that you‘re lacking restraint for respectful conversation, which is likely one of the reason people ban you. They might also ne assholes and not listen to reason, and salty, and terminally online.
But the moral of this interaction for you should be to show some restraint and basic respect towards others. That might help you get along in life better.
Feel free to answer any way you like but know that I will block any disrespectful people immediately.
Have a good one.
I'm not being disrespectful. I literally said "no offense". This is just how I always talk. You don't have to like it, but don't accuse me of being disrespectful when I'm literally just talking. I gave the reasons for those bans, none were because of how I spoke. And by "significantly more" I've seen the same thing happen to many, many other users. I have no issues communicating with anyone, but it's cool if you think I do. But I'm standing by what I said. Have a nice day!
This also applies to Tankie instances like .ml. If you're critical of them in entirely different instances. Last straw for me was getting a comment removed for "bigotry" when I responded that I still visit r/rimworld on a thread asking how things are since the reddit migration. Nothing in my post was bigotted in any way, so I assume one of the mods sifted through my comment history and saw I had recently mocked Tankies in a different thread entirely
It's getting worse lately with the tankies here. Seems like hexbear and lemmygrad are spilling over, not a surprise shortly before the election but I'm worried people will leave because of it.
tbh I think its because people started to block Hexbear and Lemmygrad more, so they had to migrate to the more tolerated servers more because none of us wanted to hear them talk about minority rights in their one hand while jerking off dictatorships with the other
lemm.ee does, anything hexbear is auto blocked for me, and after that rogue comment removal, I added .ml to that. I have a feeling in the future I might have to ban more as the Tankies try and dodge people making it clear we dont want to listen to their brain cancer
This is one of the problems with the public mod log that Lemmy has. Transparency is one of the worst things to have when dealing with bad faith actors since it's nothing but a public record of their "accomplishments." It won't stop shitty mods from being shitty.
One of the problems with the public mod log on a federated site is a moderator can just write something egregious for the ban reason and then the user is stuck with that. It propagates across instances too. I have a huge list of banned users who I never actually banned, and I assumed were banned by other instance moderators.
Having a lot of features to try to thwart bad moderation on a federated platform isn't really that important anyway since it's easy for anyone to simply create their own instance and users can migrate there.
I mean, the issue with my comment removal wasnt the transparency, it was that I had a harmless and perfectly contributing comment removed for no reason, the "Transparency" of "Rule 1" didnt apply to my comment in any way, nor was I causing a commotion on the thread.
edit: Lmao ok, the modlog is back to showing what my comment was, apparently I DID call out Tankies, albet passively, in my removed comment. So a bit snowflakey, but NOT as bad as I originally thought. Oh well, any instance that thinks the word Tanky is bigotry isnt really worth my time either
Mods are one thing, but at least Lemmy doesn't insert recommendations in my subscriptions feed.