"Women are too emotional to vote, they should only have firearms instead" is parody material.
It's called second-order thinking. Most of them don't have it. They are slowly replacing any of their leaders that can do it.
It's right up there with the GOP forcing kids to have babies but don't want to lower the voting age to 16 because "they're too immature".
Well let's just take this to the logical extreme. Then women shouldn't have twitter or shoes. Keep that thinking in the kitchen.
There's a picture of a girl with a similar build and hair as Kaitlyn. This girl is passed out face down with an enormous pile of shit resting on her thighs. While I can't say for certain it is her in that picture, someone once asked her if she shit herself at a frat party and her response was "why are you talking about that?"
To add on to the other part, cringe things she's done on college campuses, she routinely goes back to try and debate with college kids about politics using all sorts of weird false dichotomies and shit. She usually gets out debated by the kids she's bothering. She's a crazed religious zealot and a bat shit libertarian fundamentalist.
So she, a college graduate (I assume; I'm far too lazy to look it up) goes back to college to debate people who aren't as educated as her.
Like Crowder.
I mean....talk about shooting fish in a barrel.
May I draw your attention to this:
She usually gets out debated by the kids she's bothering.
Cmon you gotta stop the invasion at the border, and stop the dems from stealing your guns, and end baby murder in the womb.
No fucking self reflection with these people.
Probably the weirdest thing about modern American politics, to me, is the fact that the myth that left-wingers favor government intervention and right-wingers favor individual liberty still holds, when it's so bludgeoningly obvious that the opposite is in fact true.
At this point, it's pretty much just a given if you read an article about some government banning something - denying some right or another - that it's the right that's doing it. That's become their response to everything - whatever it is, we need to ban it. We need to get the government to interfere in everything, all the time.
Yet somehow, dunderheads continue to hold to this brazenly inaccurate myth that the left is the big government side and the right is the individual liberty side.
It's just weird to me, and not weird in a scoffing, cynicsl way - weird in an entirely alien, this doesn't even begin to even make sense way. It's as if right-wingers are running around, alternately billing themselves as the "don't get punched in the mouth" party and punching themselves in the mouth.
"See?! [Punch] If you vote for us [Punch] you won't get punched! [Punch] We're the party [Punch] that takes a stand against [Punch] punching! [Punch]."
Left-wingers generally want government intervention that applies to corporations and the wealthy, usually tax stuff to help fund social programs and regulations to keep people safe etc. Right-wingers generally want government intervention that applies to individuals, usually regarding stuff that does not actually affect them at all but they don't like it so they want the government to force people to stop doing such things.
If someone is too "emotional", I'd much rather restrict their access to firearms than voting!
Ahhh yes, because the people that are liable to take away women's right to vote is surely going to continue to allow them to own firearms.
Yeah every Nitter instance is kinda slammed rn. Twitter is not a huge fan of people scraping their site. Try this one
Thanks! God DAMN that is source of pure, concentrated stupid, plus a healthy dollop of "aged like milk". My favorite for the latter is the woman bragging about supporting Brexit. Four years later, they look even stupider than ever.
