!openscience
@lemmy.mlThe Computation Moonshot is a competition for HS students where they compete against other students/schools to donate computation cycles to medical research via !boinc@sopuli.xyz . There are thousands of dollars in prizes being given out to students and schools including science gear like microscopes, gift cards, and more.
For more info see https://computationmoonshot.org
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mbAM-T09Tkk
How to setup BOINC server in an Ubuntu Virtualbox machine. BOINC is a software and network for volunteer & distributed computing. This is the accompanying vi...
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0293289
Citizen scientists around the world are collecting data with their smartphones, performing scientific calculations on their home computers, and analyzing images on online platforms. These online citizen science projects are frequently lauded for their potential to revolutionize the scope and scale of data collection and analysis, improve scientific literacy, and democratize science. Yet, despite the attention online citizen science has attracted, it remains unclear how widespread public participation is, how it has changed over time, and how it is geographically distributed. Importantly, the demographic profile of citizen science participants remains uncertain, and thus to what extent their contributions are helping to democratize science. Here, we present the largest quantitative study of participation in citizen science based on online accounts of more than 14 million participants over two decades. We find that the trend of broad rapid growth in online citizen science participation observed in the early 2000s has since diverged by mode of participation, with consistent growth observed in nature sensing, but a decline seen in crowdsourcing and distributed computing. Most citizen science projects, except for nature sensing, are heavily dominated by men, and the vast majority of participants, male and female, have a background in science. The analysis we present here provides, for the first time, a robust ‘baseline’ to describe global trends in online citizen science participation. These results highlight current challenges and the future potential of citizen science. Beyond presenting our analysis of the collated data, our work identifies multiple metrics for robust examination of public participation in science and, more generally, online crowds. It also points to the limits of quantitative studies in capturing the personal, societal, and historical significance of citizen science.
https://nlesc.github.io/softwarehorrorgame/SoftwareHorrorGame.html
https://boinc.berkeley.edu/TESI%20pub%20en.pdf
https://community.opensource.science/t/mapping-the-oss-tool-landscape/28
Welcome to OSSci! Please share any OSS projects that are essential for your work, tools you see are gaining traction in your field, or anything else that has recently popped up on your radar. Please provide a link to the repo (e.g., GitHub) and any additional context that might be helpful for others to explore. Thanks!
https://gnulinux.ch/es-muss-nicht-google-forms-sein-online-befragungen-dsgvo-konform-und-open-source
Es gibt viele Tools, um Online-Befragungen durchzuführen, sowohl für kleine einfache Umfragen, als auch für komplexere Befragungen im wissenschaftlichen Rahmen. Einige davon wie Cryptpad Forms und LimeSurvey sind auch Open Source - Ein Überblick.
https://thesciencecommons.substack.com/p/building-systems-of-trustless-science
The Problem The system of science has reached a bottleneck. The structures that emerged hundreds of years ago are failing. Their mechanisms, manifested in a world of third party arbiters, are robbing humanity of critical advancements in medicine, energy production, materials, exploration, mathematics, and countless other areas of scientific development.
If you missed the @FORRT webinar, hosted by the Center for Open Science, I highly recommend it!
@openscience #OpenScience #OpenScholarship #Education #Psychology
https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-00486-3
Letter to the Editor