The article seems to only talk about an advance in knowledge about the degradation process. I see no mention that they have a proposed solution.
Other than the fact the article contains an out-of-context quote, where does the "smaller, lighter, and cheaper" come from.
Great there's new knowledge but seems a little more jumped-the-gunny than usual for battery-tech improvement claims.
Well not this one obviously. I just don't want to give the impression that pylons aren't safe.
I don't 'try' to do either.
Either the film's production and marketing draw me in the intended direction or they don't. When their vision and my experience fail to align, I expect I'm less likely to enjoy the film.
...That or film was garbage. YMMV
So all of you living-rough, dumpster-diving, skipping medications, holding down three jobs, etc - what do your therapist say?
Oh wait, how much does this therapy cost again... But I'm sure there's no selection bias.
@taldennz
@lemmy.nz