That would hurt the bottom line of the investors, so I doubt the Supreme Board Room goes that way.
The only way this gets past the first amendment is if it can be specifically tied to elections. It's already being challenged in court. The GOP is funding it.
No excuse was given. I don't think you comprehended my comment. I literally said I was not talking about the very people you mentioned. I also said their care should not be contingent on the work and that my concern was making sure of that when changes are made.
@roofuskit
@lemmy.world