I am not comfortable that signal depends proprietary google library. However, I find that Molly lags significantly behind signal (around 1 to 2 weeks, so maybe not as significant as I thought), but I am just concerned that if there is a security fix in signal, molly will not be able to react as fast.
I am also quite frustrated with the general lack of communication from the signal team (for example the lack of communication regarding username). I doubt they will have the good will to help molly when there is a critical security fix.
It is frustrating that signal no longer seems like the gold standard for privacy any more; unfortunately, all my friends are on there (ironic, isn't it...).
Secure camera is really good. However I find google camera works better in low light with fast moving object, like in door photo of moving pet etc.
For my use case, I have to install GCAM on my main profile, since my wife like to use it; and I don't want to go through the hassel of transferring photos between profile. But of course, I denied internet access and setup storage scope for GCAM.
But that left me wondering, am I just making my life harder by using secure camera as default? Since it seems that although secure camera is pretty good, it is not as optimized as GCAM. I already have GCAM on my phone, so I cannot think of any privacy benefit by not setting it as the default.
What do you think? do you use GCAM or secure camera, and why?
https://arstechnica.com/?p=1951562
Fairphone teams up with the developer of the /e/ Android fork to enable US sales.
https://www.androidauthority.com/delete-threads-profile-3342840/
It's come as a shock to many that they can't delete their Threads profile without also deleting their Instagram account.
@baseless_discourse
@mander.xyz