He's been proven guilty..... court of public opinion cares not for semantic philosophical bs. We are not a court of law, unbiased we have no need be.
No child abandonment is illegal. Surrendering your child is legal if done a certain amount of time after birth. Thanks for admitting you know nothing about these laws though.
California here, at 14 I didn't quite yet grasp the "you can say no to people" thing yet. Definitely not the age you should be dealing with drunk men.
Sure, not all men.... but enough men that assuming all men is the safer bet.
Somebody needs to go study up on their history. Allowing children to work has historically only ever been done to exploit cheap labour and abuse children
I was abandoned by my parents, didn't do me any harm. Guess child abandonment should be legal according to your logic.
Work in a capitalist system is predicated on exploiting labour for the purpose of profit enough. You cannot have a capitalist system and have work not be exploitative.
If it wasn't, they'd make no profit.
You were allowed to say it. I'm allowed to remove it. Welcome to the world. Don't like it? Leave.
But also: nobody in the world actually likes the idea of absolutist free speech. The founding fathers certainly didn't believe in such an idea.
"The idea of being transgender" it's not an idea anymore than you think about being cisgender. It's a false dichotomy created by cisgender people who fail to understand the issue or fall victim to the "gay agenda" rhetoric of right wing media.
A better way to phrase it is no trans person thinks of themselves as trans. A trans woman thinks of herself as a woman. A trans man thinks of himself as a man. So there's no "idea" of "being transgender" unless you're a cis person who thinks they know what they're talking about.
It's like the phrase "differently abled" only able bodied people think like that.
@Imotali
@lemmy.world