Which puts the "human shields" narrative to bed. The IOF know their attacks aren't hitting people in the tunnels or else they would have succeeded by now. The misery is the point.
Will the US step in? Or will they let Israel eat shit and negotiate some peace deal like 2006. Surely there are elements of the US government that, while fully supportive of Isn'treal existing and doing genocide, but want them to be reigned in and brought back to being a loyal client.
You're being unrealistic. It's pragmatic to vote for genocide.
I think I honestly get more mad at liberals who admit it's a genocide but still vote Democrat anyways. The frothing conservatives and die-hard Zionists at least believe what they're doing is right. But the liberals and fake leftists who say "well genocide is bad, but you can't do anything to stop it. Trump will be worse!" Ignoring what little conscience they have left.
Because they believe they have already won. It really comes down to that. "Why would you pick communism, it lost already?" is what they think. Picking the winning sides makes you smart.
Ooh that's a good one, it has the ponzi scheme aspect and the speculation aspect. And people would know it's not real but put money in it anyways.
So they expect the oil supply to increase. Does that mean they think the Russia Ukraine war will be resolved? Or that US will deregulate and increase production? Or do they have no idea and gamble?
@GoodGuyWithACat
@hexbear.net