@Cincinnatus
@lemmy.worldNo need to appeal if this is true. The judge will more than likely have to declare a mistrial
Lol, it's not a lie. There's literally more than 100 news reports and articles about it and most would argue that ballot box stuffers are the enemies of democracy
It's definitely fraud if you have a person filling out ballots in other people's names without them knowing about it. How is that not fraud?
Here you go bud, here's a video that shows the fraud taking place and that's just one short video they show. I watched all of the video on Epoch Time. A judge even ordered a redo in the election because of it. Video showed that 420 people put 1200+ ballots in the ballot boxes and this case has also caused lawmakers to write up a bill to increase election security in CT.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=p_xVnrKTd38&pp=ygUcZWxlY3Rpb24gZnJhdWQgQnJpZGdlcG9ydCBjdA%3D%3D
Yeah, it was in the works before and 2 courts declined to prosecute it, one being the very court that it's being tried in now, the other being the Federal Election Commission. I'm not imagining anything. That's just the facts bud
The statute of limitations ran up on the bookkeeping charge, so Bragg claimed that the false bookkeeping was done in order to hide another supposed crime which allows him to try and make a felony out of it, but they haven't proved the first or second crime. Some say the second crime was election interference but the problem with that theory is that Trump didn't sign the bookkeeping documents until well after the election was already over, so that wouldn't make any sense. We've basically just gotta wait until the judge gives his directions to the jury to find out what this second crime is