I am not voting for her. Stop trying to convince me to vote for her.
"When you're accustomed to privilege, equality feels like oppression."
Nobody's more privileged than this Apartheid Emerald Mine Failson.
Again the overton window has been pushed so far right in the uSSa that not wanting to open fire on black people makes you a communist.
Burgerbrains are so cooked. It would be more funnier if it wasn't directly making my life miserable.
The kind of socialism under which everybody would get the same pay, an equal quantity of meat and an equal quantity of bread, would wear the same clothes and receive the same goods in the same quantities — such a socialism is unknown to Marxism.
All that Marxism says is that until classes have been finally abolished and until labor has been transformed from a means of subsistence into the prime want of man, into voluntary labor for society, people will be paid for their labor according to the work performed. “From each according to his ability, to each according to his work.” Such is the Marxist formula of socialism, i.e., the formula of the first stage of communism, the first stage of communist society.
Only at the higher stage of communism, only in its higher phase, will each one, working according to his ability, be recompensed for his work according to his needs. “From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs.”
It is quite clear that people’s needs vary and will continue to vary under socialism. Socialism has never denied that people differ in their tastes, and in the quantity and quality of their needs. Read how Marx criticized Stirner for his leaning towards equalitarianism; read Marx’s criticism of the Gotha Programme of 1875; read the subsequent works of Marx, Engels and Lenin, and you will see how sharply they attack equalitarianism. Equalitarianism owes its origin to the individual peasant type of mentality, the psychology of share and share alike, the psychology of primitive peasant “communism.” Equalitarianism has nothing in common with Marxist socialism. Only people who are unacquainted with Marxism can have the primitive notion that the Russian Bolsheviks want to pool all wealth and then share it out equally. That is the notion of people who have nothing in common with Marxism. That is how such people as the primitive “communists” of the time of Cromwell and the French Revolution pictured communism to themselves. But Marxism and the Russian Bolsheviks have nothing in common with such equalitarian “communists.”
Haven't read this one by redsails, I was expecting Lugwig Wittgenstein and a tear down of his work, the Vienna Circle, and the influence of Piero Sraffa (who was associated with Gramsci, not sure if he was a formal member of the communist party there). What I got was still great though, really like redsails as an outlet.
Also, of anyone got paid the same it would still be pretty cool though. Like, if someone offered me a cooler job for thr way I get now I'd take it. Or like, maybe I would take an easier job I like more. If I could go back to digging holes I would prefer it to the paperwork jobs I have had. The pay and other factors make that not as viable under capitlaism though.
Marx says it all best in Part 1 of his Gotha critique. Especially focusing on excerpt #3. I think it’s clearer and also eliminates any third person interpretation of Marx
https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1875/gotha/ch01.htm
I can’t tell if he is meming or not. Anyway, this guy is truly an imbecile, the fact that millions take him serious because of his wealth is not only a testament of the need for mass reeducation but a damning indictment of material conditions
Hate this fucker with every fiber of my being
If a person that wants to be relevant resorts to meming in a serious topic, such as politics and human well-being, in my opinion, such a person will never be relevant and is an extra nail on the " I'm lacking attention coffin ".
It's pretty funny how he's always frothing at the mouth that Democrats are literal communists yet has never publicly spoken one ill word about the CCP.
P-p-please build more EVs so citizens can get t-tax cr-c-
SHUT YOUR GOOFY ASS UP. KKKOMMIE THINKS HE CAN TELL ME WHAT TO DO
伊隆，我會佔領你的工廠。
Yes, sir. Glory to the Communist Party of China.
Oh my god Musk is so dumb. It's kind of incredible how this guy was able to market himself as a genius at some point.
He's singlehandedly disproving the idea of billionaire meritocracy to normal people. What a champ.
lol right, libs used to swear he was irl tony stark who'd terraform and colonize mars. remember that simpsons episode?
i hope they learn something from this next time the media tries to put them on some Great Man Theory gimmicky con artist, but they probably won't
I know I'm screaming into the void but you really completely lack any kind of humanity if you complain about people being given equal outcomes regardless of their means.
It really is wild that 70% of thenpeople around me are enthusiastically voting for big city billionaires and corporations to feed them fetch first into a meat grinder.
And then they talk about providing for and protecting their families while they joyously squeal to be slaves.
oh WOWWW the liberal rhetorical retreat from "equality" to "equity" didn't do anything to win over psychopath chuds but just weakened their supposed commitment to justice?????????????????
I thought equity was supposed to be stronger language? Either way the libs are at it again, thinking that changing the language of things changes the thing itself
This is the part that the right-wing libs play in locking people into a two-party mentality. I think a lot of them know their derision functions as an endorsement to any left-sympathetic readers, so they mostly avoid even mentioning third-party leftists whenever they can. Right-wing libs freaking out instead over a cardboard spectre 
also feeds the brunch libs' self-image as 'the resistance'.
It's as elegant as it is vapid
I'll take mine well done
THIS CALLS FOR RACIAL HOLY WAR
:::