https://eylenburg.github.io/android_comparison.htm
Comparison of Android ROMs
I stumbled across this today and thought it was worth sharing. I have used every one of these ROMs except /e/ and they are all good projects in their own right.
There's nothing inherently safer in Pixels, they are just the only ones that get security updates fast enough for Graphenes taste
Oh yes there is. ARMv9 MTE, Titan M2 secure element supporting Android Verified Boot, StrongBox (https://source.android.com/docs/security/features/keystore), Weaver, Hardware key attestation and Insider attack resistance, as well as a programmable USB controller that allows the user to fully disable USB-C (while the device is locked) on a hardware level. Pixels also have hardware support for full Wi-Fi MAC address randomization, and all radios are completely separated from the main system through IOMMU. I recommend this video, it's a pretty good breakdown of some of the hardware security features + the GrapheneOS privacy/security improvements.
I think it's trying to say that DivestOS has removed more proprietary blobs than the others. Poor wording, I agree.
How exactly is AOSP not FOSS and debloated?
Kinda hard to take any of this seriously with those claims...
Lot of proprietary google stuff in asop, especially binary blobs