(MC^2 + C√P)^2 wouldn't give you that result though, because you have to FOIL.
Instead you'd get M^(2) C^4 + 2MC^(3)√P + PC^2
And that's not even the correct formula. It's
E^2 = (mc^(2))^2 + (pc)^2
You can't just naively apply a square root unless one of the terms is vanishing (momentum for a stationary mass, giving E = mc^2, or rest mass for a massless particle, giving E = pc = hf).
The way to remember this is that it's equivalent to the Pythagorean theorem, A^2 + B^2 = C^(2).
So it in fact only makes sense if AI = 0.
In my experience, when E=mc² is written, physicists generally mean relativistic mass, making the formula extract, whereas m_0 is used for rest mass, as seen in the expansion E = m_0c² + m_0v²/2 + O(v⁴)
Where does that expansion come from? As far as I can tell, m0v^(2)/2 only gives you the kinetic energy of the object where v << c, in which case the difference between relativistic mass and rest mass is negligible?
And where does the O(v^4) term come from?
This really seemed like a good simplification until you threw in that d'Alembert operator at the end
I am Indian myself, so I have a better understanding about the internet sub-culture intrinsic to my country. This is a neutral stereotype about 'WhatsApp Unkils'. It is a counter-reaction to ageism towards younger people, whose intelligence is mocked, simply because they're younger - the Asian culture of "elders are always right" snubs Gen-Y, Z and younger folks. Now that internet has blown up in India, old people who are literate and take pride in this sort of elitism are embarrassing themselves with their "confidently incorrect" takes on the internet.
Basically the same is happening to boomers, e. g. in Europe, too. Also ageism is happening here too. I don't know, how much worse it is over on your part of the planet, but here you're also not taken seriously when you're young
I've heard about an extended version of the equation:
E^2^ = m^2^c^4^ + p^2^c^2^
Or E = (m^2^c^4^ + p^2^c^2^)^1/2^
If so, AI = (m^2^c^4^ + p^2^c^2^)^1/2^ - mc^2^
I may have the capabilities to be a technology management consultant
So math is like painting, you can just arbitrarily add a splash of color somewhere to change the mood..
As I said in another thread where this was posted, that original post has the distinctive voice of ChatGPT. Could be another similar model, but I'd bet money that was written by an LLM.
I mean, the equation isn't wrong given that AI basically becomes a rounding error and can be safely ignored.
I like how the OP's name was censored for their privacy, but not the name of the person responding. Also, what the hell are these people huffing?
I paid to watch it! Hey, wait a second... Do you think Mr. XTalk could be just trying to take our money while building a disinformation platform of unchecked greed?
It really reads like it was written by AI. I’ve never been to linkedin, maybe everyone talks like that there but it really sounds like it was written by ChatGPT
Ha! "Consultant / Technology Manager" -- pretty sure he's just working on the next buzzword buffet to justify his bloated comp package.
Oh well, gives me an excuse to link this Weird Al song that makes far more sense.
Here is an alternative Piped link(s):
Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.
I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.
Critical support for struggling academics trying to grift some brainless tech bro billionaire out of his money
Oops my bad I mess read who’s the phd and who’s the sentient clipart