What's your favorite terminal?
I'm looking for a new terminal. What's your favorite one and why? Which one is popular?
I'm looking for a new terminal. What's your favorite one and why? Which one is popular?
Kitty, hands down. GPU accelerated; native image protocol implemented by ranger
, neofetch
, and more; incredibly customizable; multiplexing with multiple windows and tabs; ligature support; and much more
If anybody has any questions about it, swing on over to Kitty Terminal Emulator [!kittyterimal@midwest.social]
How often do you use images inside a terminal?
Why having a Gpu-accelarated terminal? The computational power used by the graphical rendering of a terminal is minimal...
I've been using it for a while now, and it is fine. But it is very often that I open htop and kitty is one of the big cpu wasters. Maybe I've configured something wrong? But yeah, sure, works.
I like Konsole.
It comes with KDE, supports tabs, themes, and loads very fast.
I don't really need more from a terminal than that. When I, rarely, need more advanced features like window splitting and session management I also use Zellij (previously I used tmux).
When I, rarely, need more advanced features like window splitting and session management I also use Zellij
Konsole does window splitting as well, doesn't it?
Yakuake is similar but drop down based (like quake). I love having a hot key to access my terminal (tabs, splits, and all). Especially when editing in vim and looking at docs in Firefox it's such a buttery smooth workflow.
I granted I haven't tried any outside of what comes pre-installed on whatever DE I'm currently using, but yeah Konsole is the best
terminal? i think you'll find its a terminal emulator, haha! /s
i like kitty, its fast, simple, and supports ligatures.
My favorite is Alacritty but I don't use it because of stability issues lol. Kitty is popular now. It seems to have some questionable update policy but it's fixable. It supports plugins (kittens), tabs and most of the common features. Though the configuration is done in a text file. It doesn't have a GUI for it. For that I'd recommend Konsole
Most things in Linux are configured via text files. It's one of the main principles of Linux; store configs in plain text files. Saves us from having to use awful tooling like that of the windows registry. Even most GUI config settings are just manipulating a text file under the hood.
Well yeah. But would you rather a GUI that stores the settings in easy to read and manipulate plain text files; Linux, or an archaic GUI that manipulates raw data and often breaks and is hard to understand; Windows registry.
Even if you prefer GUIs, you'd probably still want the data stored in plain text files for the sake of simplicity and consistency.
I prefer text files. What I meant is that not everyone does. That people like Konsole more
I agree that Konsole are Kitty are both lovely terminals that are very configurable. Kitty for text file people vim enthusiasts and Konsole for GUI lovers.
By "questionable update policy", do you mean that it is updated by the package manager when installed from official repositories but it has an auto-updater functionality for users installing it manually?
IIRC someone who compiled from source but didn't set the flag/config to disable the auto-updater was surprised about that.
I don't see the big deal of it to be honest. The vast majority of users will be installing through the package manager. If you compile from source, you can decide yourself whether you want it to auto-update. The whole point of compiling from source is the extra control, not the defaults, I'd guess. Unless you don't know what you are doing and the package was not available for your distro and in that case, enabling auto-update by default even serves that user group.
It's more about the fact that the Kitty's developer rudely and aggressively refused to disable automatic updates after a ton of requests. Some people just don't use certain software if they don't like the developer
I like kitty, but it's configuration system is completely nuts.
Alacritty was good, but had weird issues with fonts for me.
I ended up on Wezterm. Lots of modern features, performance, stability, and awesome configurability.
I can't remember all of them but now I have a weird issue that when I open Alacritty there's some loading going on in the background for quite a few seconds which I can even see on the cursor (I think it's "xdg" that's loading) and even reinstalling the system didn't help
Oh I think I know what you mean. Did you try setting your shell to something like sh
instead of bash or zsh and see if it was a shell startup issue?
And your default shell is a POSIX compliant shell, usually dash or ash, so that's what I mean by sh
. You can set it in ~/.config/alacritty/alacritty.toml
with:
[shell]
program = "/bin/sh"
Wezterm is my favourite because it's really configurable and supports ligatures. Konsole is also quite nice. Generally I'm in favour of using whichever one comes with your DE, or Wezterm if you use a WM.
Kitty is probably the most popular one, but I don't like it cause no ligature support no acceleration it claims it has good font management, but fonts never worked properly in my experience.
Alacritty and Foot are also popular for their performance. Alacritty does have some stability issues though.
People out here talking about graphics card accelerated terminals as if they're able to read text that scrolls by on a non-accelerated terminal.
Konsole fulfills all my needs except synchronised splits. For that, I still use tmux
.
I use blackbox, looks nice and can customize shortcuts. https://itsfoss.com/blackbox-terminal/
Damn this was my first thought too.
Someone pass me an AARP card and a Costco-sized tube of ointment…
I think Openbox is the main survivor of the *box WMs – Openbox has become pretty much the default choice for small Linux distros, either with a few utilities like crunchbangplusplus or BunsenLabs or as the base of a lightweight DE like LXDE/LXQt
I like kitty because:
How often do you use the image display within a terminal?
Kitty is not "minimal" at all, it's full of superfluous features... I used it for many years and I loved it, but I wouldn't say it's "minimal"
I use foot because it's wayland native and the developer is a very nice person. Only thing missing from it for me is ligature support.
A close second for me is WezTerm. It is very full featured, although I do not use a lot of its features. Developer is also extremely nice and helpful. It does have ligature support.
I personally use tiling window managers, so I have no need for built-in tiling / tabbing features.
I want to love it too. I use dwm, and tried ST for a year, but I gave up. Tmux doesn't solve every issue, and specially when you have to manage another Tmux session on a server, it gets ridiculous.
I want to use as much suckless as possible, but ST just doesn't work for me.
Well I'll throw in my endorsement for kitty. I like the ligature support, the fact that it can be configured to hide all UI, and it uses text files for configuration that I can put in my dot files repo.
There are some particular features that I use constantly:
I can yank a file path to the prompt from previous output by pressing ctrl+shift+p then f then a 1-character label. I can do the same with a git hash (or other hash) by pressing h instead of f.
I can scroll back and search previous output using only the keyboard with ctrl+shift+h which puts the terminal history in a pager.
I can get the output of only the previous command in a pager with ctrl+shift+g. Or jump to previous prompts with ctrl+shift+x and ctrl+shift+z.
I use kitty-scrollback.nvim which replaces that pager with neovim so I can use all of my editor features to search history, copy what I want, etc.
ADM-3A for beauty and the vim keys.
TRS-80 DT-1 for weirdness.
IBM 5251 for beam spring keys.
DEC VT320 because library nostalgia.