"Reportedly" ? How hard would it be to verify this claim ? Now that's some investigative journalism !
Daily Mail is a trash newspaper in the UK. It should completely be ignored as being factual.
Is it because female body types in this game are smaller than males but the penis size remains the same, so they only appear larger?
Yes. A fat person penis will look smaller despite being the same size as another who is normal.
It's genuinely hilarious that I wasn't sure if this was a real headline or not. It really does seem like the type of shit they'd write
To be fair, there are only two female genital options in BG3. Both called "vulva", and the only difference is one has public hair while the other does not. If it were even remotely "woke", not only would the options be more than "innies", but they'd be more representative of realistic variance. /my2¢
I honestly wish game devs would put their effort somewhere else. I hardly ever see my character naked. Having genital options just feels like a sales gimmick for teenagers
Hey game dev, hope you're okay missing your son's first steps coz we're busy crunching out those vulva options for our fantasy rpg.
It's actually race specific, there's at least 3 vulvas, tho i wouldn't be able to tell you the differences
DailyMail get don't mad about optional shit in a video game challenge (IMPOSSIBLE). Seriously, I turned the nudity off. Its one of the first things it asks you about.
What?! I just wanted to have sex with a bear, and now I find out abouy depravity like this?!
The headline is made up, but it's impossible to tell whether it's a joke or designed to manufacture outrage.
If you've messed around with Skyrim, uh, mods, you'll know that these sizes bug out all the time. Probably less about being woke and more "I put 5 as a value for penis size, but 5 means different things in the male and female models"
I guarantee they were “thinking of the children” while fondling their character’s options.
It has been well known for a while that BG allows modification to genitalia. It isn't woke bashing enough to say, BG allows someone to make a trans character. Their base doesn't give a fuck about someone playing a computer game but add in the extra feminist shtick about larger penis size and boy howdy, that's some wedge issue cultural war bullshit to flog clicks.
It's some wedge issue culture war bullshit that'll ultimately help sell more copies of Baldur's Gate.
I think it's awesome that we can create characters from marginalized people in current society, when people get used to something it becomes normal and accepted. It's a good thing, not some wedge issue. We need to be more accepting of people that do nothing but be themselves as long as it's not trying to push down others.
Most definitely. The thing with BG delivery of the opportunity to create marginalised characters is that it was largely done without fanfare, it's just an option.
That's exactly what angry gammons say they want, so the papers are trying to stir the pot with this absurd female dick angle.
Speaking only for myself, I made sure to look at all the races naked when creating my character.
I literally see comments in steam discussions about random games with the title "is this game woke?"
Fucking propaganda man... It's so annoying.
Tell me you're a brainwashed Reich wing media consumer without telling me you're a brainwashed Reich wing media consumer. I just roll my eyes and move on.
Seriously. And they have the gall to call US the snowflakes. Choke on my half-orc girl cock, losers.
Yup, I remember the D20 modern rulebook alternated using "he/him" and "she/her" throughout the text. One class section would use "he/him" to describe the archetypical character for that class, and the next would use "she/her".
I remember it left an impression on me as a teenage boy.