Right? I live in a region of the US where most of my neighbors are openly RW, armed, and publicly joke about killing people like me. And liberals think their particular definition of 'legal need'' is something I should give two shits about?
Really shows that particular American democrat mindset, where they conflate "legal" with "moral" in all things.
killing fascists is self defence. we'll know who needs to die before they know we want it. you can absolutely kill someone with an air rifle.
but what about my second amendment rights?! smdh
(no i'm not anti-gun, i'm just astonished at this meme)
but reich-wingers wouldn't notice the "militia" part
they think they're entitled to guns regardless
It actually means that the needed weapons and firearms can not be restricted, so ,if the need rises, a militia can be formed.
