What's the historical reason it wasn't included in one of the other states?
When Texas sought to enter the Union in 1845 as a slave state, federal law in the United States, based on the Missouri Compromise, prohibited slavery north of 36°30' parallel north. Under the Compromise of 1850, Texas surrendered its lands north of 36°30' latitude.
It has a lot to do with the US using Oklahoma as a dumping zone for first Americans and then over time taking even that from them piece by piece.
If your interested, Jonny Harris did a piece on it recently.
Here is an alternative Piped link(s): https://piped.video/d8-kGVCzKwA
Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.
I'm open-source, check me out at GitHub.
Excuse me, but I happen to live in Oklahoma City and I really don't appreciate how accurate you're being right now...
Oklahoman here! I’ve personally haven’t spent much time in this part of the state. It’s was historically referred to as “No Man’s Land” if that gives you any idea. The panhandle has a much more arid, high plains type climate than other parts of the state. I believe there are literal sand dunes out that way. Oklahoma’s highest point, Black Mesa, is in the panhandle. Im told Black Mesa is a great camping spot for star-gazing, but I’ve never been. As far as I’m aware it’s mostly right-wing but jobs living in that area. I seem to recall a few local news stories about people in that part of the state making a big stink about trans kids trying to use the bathroom and so forth.
Black Mesa is the organization, IIRC. I had it in my head that the research facility was near Los Alamos, NM, but that might just be because I associate any theoretical physics research in a desert with Los Alamos.
As far as I’m aware it’s mostly right-wing (nut) jobs living in that area.
This is different from the rest of Oklahoma how?
Well, not really. Oklahoma is a deeply red state, but it is more liberal in areas like Oklahoma City, Tulsa, and the university towns. I've always gotten the impression that people living in the panhandle were a different breed of conservative psycho though.
Like all states, there is a gradient of political leanings, especially around cities. For instance, northern Virginia is nothing like the rest of Virginia at all. I imagine it's similar in Oklahoma, where the major population centers don't reflect the rest of the state at all.
Former Texan here: slavery is why that exists. They ceded the land so they could enter the union as a slave state.
Weddings where everyone sits on the same side of the church and some of the worst maintained roads in America.
I don't think I've ever been to a wedding in a church. Are the families supposed to split up?
Usually it's split by the friends and family of the bride on one side and groom on the other.
Then the terrible roads must somehow be the fault of "those libruls', when there's not a liberal in sight as far as the crow flies for a couple of days at least.
The Trump sign, flag, or bulletin board per square mile is unreal. I've driven through there a few times and I legit don't feel safe.
They are incapable of understanding that it is the lack of progressive policies that keep their region a neglected backwater.
There are way too many big words in that sentence for them to have any hope of understanding. You've got to use little words and one concept at a time.
They are not upset that it is neglected. They'd rather they were left alone to do their thing. They feel like they are being attacked, because everyone else is trying to drag them into the 21st century.
It's pretty much the heart of where the dust bowl of the 1930s was. Most of the people who lived there left and never came back. They moved to places like Bakersfield, California, which is a big part of how you get the "Bakersfield Sound" in country music with guys like Buck Owens and Merle Haggard.
That’s where people drive when they want to avoid Texas’ draconian laws. Think of it as a neutral zone.