Like bold, but even louder.
BOLD CAPS are even louder, throw in BOLD ITALIC CAPS for incredulous outrage.
If I had to pick a name for this kind of slang/phrasing, I think it would be something like “superlative trunc”, as in a truncated superlative (biggest, smallest, oldest, richest, tastiest, etc).
I have a friend who suddenly realized they had a habit of blowing on very cold bites of food (like ice cream) as though it was something too hot to eat. They rationalized this as needing to do it for any food that was “too temperature.”
Ah, neat, I'll have to check that out! I run Debian, but I don't find myself in need of special characters too often.
Number 3 but as a complete sentence. Like; "What."
Sometimes the question is a statement on its own.
Italic is emphasis, either neutral or annoyed depending on context. Bold emphasis imo is much angrier. The difference between "Maybe you overlooked what I was saying," and "Maybe you didn't quite hear me."
In my experience it is righteous fury emphasis, which is why I see it almost never. Nobody gets angry enough to bring out the bold, they just block first.
Bold also necessary when you really really really want to make a point. I often do this in work emails where if a step is skipped it's going to massively break something.
Do X
Then do Y
Do NOT click save
Click Apply
Only NOW click Save
I swear to God Susan if you mess this up again.
Thanks,
IT support
I'm not a native speaker and have a few questions about the first point:
There's no mechanical/grammar reason but the first one is used sarcastically. When someone thinks something is a big deal/great/awesome and you say back "well that's certainly a thing" it's implying that the only thing you agree on is that that thing exists, not that it's great.
The other two are nonsense and some people just find that funny.
"That's certainly a thing" refers to phrases such as "You definitely said words." It expresses that one wants to acknowledge that something happened which demands commentary, but the commentary is self-evident, and thus sarcastically skipped.
I think Tumblr's particular grammatical quirks are fascinating. I'm pretty sure it's a result of people replying to posts in the tags, which have some limitations (obviously no commas, exclamation points change the order of tags, no quotes, certain themes changing capitalization, etc). Over time, it's just become the way people talk on there.
I've read it like five times and I still don't understand the first one. What are they saying/asking
You see someone post a drawing, and it's really not good.
"That's certainly one of the drawings of all time"
The expectation for the phrase would be "that's one of the best drawings of all time" or "one of the worse drawings of all time" but removing the adjective to break the sentence creates this ironic feeling of stating something is underwhelming without directly saying so.
That they like semi broken sentences. Ones that make sense, or are super vague, but are incorrectly structured.
They have replacement words in there.
That's certainly a thing
I.e. "That's certainly a car" or "That's certainly a shirt"
That's so shaped
I.e. "That's so squared" or "That's so rounded" (I'm not certain of this one"
One of the best animals
I.e. "He's one of the best doggos"
That's my best guess but not sure
Unless they literally meant "that is so shaped", I could also imagine replacing the "so", like, " is friend shaped"
Though thinking about it, I haven't seen anything other than "friend shaped" so that's probably not it.
Adding apostrophe's where they don't belong? I know that's kind of a typo/unintentional thing, but I only recently started noting it as widespread.
