!sciencefiction@lemmy.world
Welcome to /c/ScienceFiction
December book club canceled. Short stories instead!
We are a community for discussing all things Science Fiction. We want this to be a place for members to discuss and share everything they love about Science Fiction, whether that be books, movies, TV shows and more. Please feel free to take part and help our community grow.
!sciencefiction
@lemmy.worldhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B7oNYUj29zY
Auf YouTube findest du die angesagtesten Videos und Tracks. Außerdem kannst du eigene Inhalte hochladen und mit Freunden oder gleich der ganzen Welt teilen.
https://mutantreviewersmovies.com/2024/09/06/in-search-of-tomorrow-2022-the-ultimate-80s-scifi-documentary/
Justin’s rating: Beam me up, Chewbacca! Justin’s review: For a good while now, I’ve been drooling at the thought of going through this five-hour documentary on ’80s scifi fi…
First a definition for this question, because there are many kinds of sci-fi out there and they sometimes liberally use cool sounding words without explaining them:
A disruptor is a kind of weapon that weakens, or "disrupts", either material bonds (breaking a material into molecules), molecular bonds (breaking a molecule into atoms), or atomic bonds (breaking an atomic nucleus into protons, netrons, and free electrons. Almost like instantly turning into plasma).
Temperature can do these things, but the idea behind a disruptor, specifically, is that it happens through some kind of catalyst, rather than brute-forcing with insane amounts of heat.
Would such a weapon physically be possible (even if we don't know how to make them just yet)?
How would a target realistically behave when hit by a disruptor?
https://www.netflix.com/tudum/articles/terminator-zero-first-six-minutes
“It’s going to be violent, it’s going to be dark, it’s going to be horrific, and it’s going to be arresting.”
I just finished part 1 and, well, I'm kinda disappointed. It's not bad, I think it's actually pretty solid, but compared to the book it's much worse in terms of story progression and characters. Some parts felt really rushed. I didn't expect it to be better than the book, but I still expected better adaptation considering that (at least as far as I know) it was well received and I knew that it didn't adapt whole book so I expected it to don't skip too much. Is part 2 any better?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5usXhX0zaO4
Auf YouTube findest du die angesagtesten Videos und Tracks. Außerdem kannst du eigene Inhalte hochladen und mit Freunden oder gleich der ganzen Welt teilen.
https://www.gamesradar.com/entertainment/fantasy-shows/id-have-them-finished-game-of-thrones-author-george-rr-martin-says-the-one-thing-hed-change-about-a-song-of-ice-and-fire-is-the-same-thing-weve-wanted-for-13-years/
Us too, George, us too
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-myLr8r9MoQ&t=12s
Auf YouTube findest du die angesagtesten Videos und Tracks. Außerdem kannst du eigene Inhalte hochladen und mit Freunden oder gleich der ganzen Welt teilen.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GA6V-WVKeRw
Auf YouTube findest du die angesagtesten Videos und Tracks. Außerdem kannst du eigene Inhalte hochladen und mit Freunden oder gleich der ganzen Welt teilen.