Degrowth as a community topic has somewhat of a problem, in that it is rather limited. Posting about the need to shrink the economy smartly becomes repetitive over time. So I tried to increase the scope of the community a bit by allowing other related topics like UBI, housing cooperatives, worker owned companies and so forth. However I do understand that this might be controversial. So I have a few question to the people intressted in this commuity:
-
Is increasing the scope of the community a good idea?
-
What topics should be offtopic in this community? As in do we allow say discussions about renewable energy, carbon markets and maybe even green stocks. Right now I see a bunch of China economy posts. Are those reasonable?
-
Should I rename the community to reflect a wider scope of discussion? If so what name would be good?
-
How can we make the community more intressting in general? Say topic of the week, more memes or whatever.
-
Where should the moderation line be? No swearing or going for even implied insults.
I would love to get some good feedback and suggestions. Thanks for them in advance.
A Tour of the Jevons Paradox: How Energy Efficiency Backfires – Economics from the Top Down
A Tour of the Jevons Paradox: How Energy Efficiency Backfires – Economics from the Top Down
https://economicsfromthetopdown.com/2024/05/18/a-tour-of-the-jevons-paradox-how-energy-efficiency-backfires/
Efficiency isn't a tool for conserving energy --- it's a catalyst for technological sprawl.
A response to Hannah Ritchie: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love Economic Growth – Timothée Parrique
A response to Hannah Ritchie: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love Economic Growth – Timothée Parrique
https://timotheeparrique.com/a-response-to-hannah-ritchie-how-i-learned-to-stop-worrying-and-love-economic-growth/
Report outlines a path to prosperity for planet and people if Earth's critical resources are better shared
Report outlines a path to prosperity for planet and people if Earth's critical resources are better shared
https://phys.org/news/2024-09-outlines-path-prosperity-planet-people.html
Earth will only remain able to provide even a basic standard of living for everyone in the future if economic systems and technologies are dramatically transformed and critical resources are more fairly used, managed and shared, according to an international research team including scientists from The Australian National University (ANU).
Consumerism and the climate crisis threaten equitable future for humanity, report says
Consumerism and the climate crisis threaten equitable future for humanity, report says
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2024/sep/12/consumerism-and-the-climate-crisis-threaten-equitable-future-for-humanity-report-says
The Earth Commission says hope lies in sustainable lifestyles, a radical transformation of global politics and fair distribution of resources
Credit guidance: how we achieve degrowth — Jason Hickel
https://www.jasonhickel.org/blog/2024/8/20/credit-guidance-how-we-achieve-degrowth
Degrowth scholarship calls for reducing less-necessary production in rich countries to enable faster decarbonization and reverse other ecological pressures. But how can this be achieved? What is the mechanism? For many years ecological economists advocated setting “caps
Just a moment...
https://znetwork.org/znetarticle/post-growth-why-and-how/
The Regeneration Handbook: System-changing strategies
https://www.shareable.net/the-regeneration-handbook-system-changing-strategies/
To inspire hope that ordinary people such as ourselves can bring about meaningful change, I’ve included brief snapshots below of some of the largest and
Companies Won't Keep Their Net-Zero Promises
https://degrowthistheanswer.substack.com/p/companies-wont-keep-their-net-zero
There is nothing in it for them.
Transcending the ‘imperial mode of living’
Transcending the ‘imperial mode of living’
https://canadiandimension.com/articles/view/transcending-the-imperial-mode-of-living
In contrast to the simplistic notion that capital unilaterally imposes consumption upon us, German scholars Ulrich Brand and Markus Wissen, authors of The Imperial Mode of Living, emphasize a dialectical analysis in which capitalist domination “draws on the wishes and desires of the populace … becomes a part of individual identity, shapes it, and thereby becomes all the more effective.”