Does Michael Caine realize he sounds like he’s talking about his stash of blow when he introduces himself?
That's a really thought-provoking question. Beyond the fact we don't hear our own voices in the same way as others hear us (due to our own cranial vibrations I seem to remember?), do our self-image and voice projection match how others look at us, see us and in this case, hear us?
I will have to meditate on the matter.
If I poop on a plate and my partner eats it would that be more sanitary than just pooping in their mouth?
Well that's certainly a disgusting question, but is it stupid? To find the answer we'll have to investigate several important topics, from personal hygiene to germ theory. The resulting knowledge could literally mean the difference between life and death in certain situations.
I don’t have anything that would satisfy you in regards to this.
I respect your approach to our different standards. Only hindsight can tell us who had the best tools for working towards the same goals.
From my understanding there was roughly 11 hours of closed door hearings with congressional lawyers. The issue was getting people in the room with the right clearances to view the evidence. Again, reported on by the same journalists.
While I understand that journalists must protect their sources, there's also the issue of "Just trust me bro". In these grey areas I tend to view cases on the basis of lowest common denominator and in layers of confidence: I don't see how closed door hearings necessarily mean presenting evidence, just that (at least) the topics and claims being discussed potentially have an impact on US national security? Of course this doesn't exclude any presentation of evidence, up to and including marching out a genuine grey alien.
So I know it's potentially some very serious stuff, I have reason to believe the validity of Grusch' claims, it is possible evidence have been presented behind closed door and it is within the realm of possibility that this is the start of a partial and controlled disclosure and I cannot exclude that it straight up is the beginning of Disclosure.
With so many different claims in the UFO/UAP field, how do you find people you trust and find credible? I'm partial to Richard Dolan, as a UFO historian he has an academic approach - I can check his credible claims for myself in publicly available sources and after doing this enough times I have found I trust his information despite not always agreeing with his conclusion.
I’m also interested in the 2019 IG statement
After closer examination it seems the date is wrong. It is July 2021 and regarding "Confidentially provided classified information to the Department of Defense Inspector General concerning the withholding of UAP-related information from Congress." which seems more like actually blowing the whistle rather than complaining about the treatment he got as a whistleblower, described as "a whistleblower reprisal investigation" in the timeline overview linked below.
Just a patent for a UFO made back in the 2000's by a US Navy guy, along with patents for zero-point energy and anti-gravity drives.
Edit:
edit: I read that wrong.
Seems there's been some miscommunication.
I still wish you a nice life, prosperity and many revelations in the times ahead.
It's a classic "Accuse them of what you're doing"-tactic. It's meant to make conscientious people stop and examine what is considered a baseless critique from the beginning, essentially disrupting the conversation. In game theory, the accuser has nothing to lose but a lot to gain by using this tool, while you have little to gain and a lot to lose. Play in the mud with the pigs at your own risk.
said he has provided evidence of such to the Inspector General.
I missed that, do you have an approximation on when during the hearing he said it?
Yes, I heard he'd answer many of those questions you mention as long as it was in a secure facility.
If I told you I could make false claims and provide an example, would you agree that claims, statements and testimonies should not be considered as evidence? Keep in mind that I replied to someone claiming that Grusch had provided evidence.
Watch:
Spiro Agnew is the mastermind behind it all, it's all done by Park Rangers and accountants residing in a compound three miles south of Disney World are responsible for hiding the spending. Non-human biological entities are cat-people and the UFO's are all stored in the Denver Airport basements.
The evidence Mr. Grusch provided included [...]
But if the only thing that's been publicly confirmed is the whistleblower complaint, then how do you know what sort of evidence has been handed over? Without sarcasm, perhaps you or someone you know are an insider?
From my investigations, starting with the article in "The Debrief", Grusch have provided testimony but no evidence to congress. Many hours of transcribed testimony. But no photographic evidence or documents.
When the Intelligence Community IG commented on the whistleblower complaint - he talked about the reprisals Grusch faced and not the content of the whistleblowing. The DoD IG that treated Grusch' report in 2019 found the accusations to be not credible.
Unfortunately your reply leave me with more questions than answers. I'd love to be convinced about your claims, but then you'd have to show me how you know some of these things instead of just claiming it be like that.
Is there any way to find out what sort of evidence he's volunteered to present in a SCIF? From what I understood (not native English speaker) there were certain confirmations he'd only be willing to make in a secure location, but I didn't catch any mentions of actual evidence.
To me it seems the statements he's only willing to make in a SCIF was of the "Yes I can confirm that we have alien bodies." type. That's kinda already implicit.
@spacesape
@lemmy.nrsk.no