"Python crash course" sounds good - I haven't read it personally but my experience with no starch press books is that they're pretty good.
Other options are "A byte of Python" and "Automate the boring stuff with Python".
I am also someone who prefers physical books. When I was learning I went to my local library and took out pretty much their entire section of Python books (not that big) and read through them.
Most important is to find out what works for you!
Nice project! What approach to solving the sudoku did you use, is it a backtracking algorithm?
Having a look at the code it looks like there's quite a lot of repetition that could probably be refactored to be a bit cleaner!
What better headline would you propose in this case?
I don't think that rule is valid here, the question isn't there because the answer is definitively "no" and they just want clickbait, it's there because the actual article is about the question.
(Side note: I'm aware most people here will strongly argue that the answer is no, and I agree, but that is not my point.)
Of the 1,723 adults surveyed across the UK, 73% said technology companies should, by law, have to scan private messaging for child sexual abuse and disrupt it in end-to-end encrypted environments.
Found this interesting. I found the survey results here: https://docs.cdn.yougov.com/68pn2b6b57/NSPCC_OnlineSafetyBill_230427_W.pdf
The exact question I believe is being referred to was:
And do you think technology companies should or should not be required by law to use accredited technology to identify child sexual abuse in end-to-end encrypted messaging apps?
This seems like a really bad question, since it implies a coexistence of end to end encryption and big tech companies being able to read people's messages, which doesn't really make sense (or at least requires more clarification on what that would mean). The question as it is is basically "do you think child sexual abuse is bad".
I use VSCode with config options to disable telemetry. Probably not perfect but good enough for me, I'm very happy using VSCode
I wish I could have extensions default to off and be able to turn them on selectively on sites. For things like darkreader I don't want to use it 90% of the time so it shouldn't need to have at access to site data.
By the way, I don't like the title of this article, how is it done "remotely", it's just a list in about:config, no? Sounds clickbaity.
Is "scrapping" autocorrect, a typo, or intended? Not meaning to be rude just interested because I've only heard of "web scraping" but often see people write "scrapping".
@qwop
@programming.dev